Choice is surely nothing far from an assumption or presumption of the extent to the freedom or freewill that one has. Freewill is a strand of reality made possible by the power that be or by the power the individual has accumulated over time in understanding and bending the truth. The assumption of choice means one knows or has knowledge of the truth or the judgment and conclusion to what is right or wrong, good or bad, or good and evil. Truth lies in its evidential proof. Truth is not a thing without proof of it being a thing. But without moral compass, legal binding, or good conscience, what is truth away from subjectivity, impositions, or indoctrinations? We soon embrace that which we have run away from our entire lives. Humans run away from the truth until it suits them. To most, Truth is a friend until it’s a foe. It’s necessary until it’s unnecessary. The weak and powerful define truth differently. Isn’t truth a means to an end? Isn’t it erroneous to mistake Religious Truth (RT) for Moral Truth (MT), or Moral Truth for Legal Truth (LT), or Legal Truth for Common-sense Truth (CT), or Academic Truth (AT) for Intuition Truth (IT), or Intuition Truth for Gut Truth (GT), or Gut Truth for Survival Truth (ST)?
Types of Truths:
• Religious Truth (RT)
• Moral Truth (MT)
• Legal Truth (LT)
• Common-sense Truth (CT)
• Academic Truth (AT)
• Intuition Truth (IT)
• Survival Truth (ST)
• Gut Truth (GT)
AI Philosopher Prince Israel Zaar 07022025
Overview of Text
The provided text, attributed to “Al Philosopher Prince Israel Zaar 07022025,” explores the concept of truth and its various forms:
Choice and Freewill:
The author posits that choice is an assumption based on the extent of one’s freewill, which is influenced by power and understanding of truth.
Nature of Truth:
Truth is presented as requiring evidential proof and is contrasted with subjective interpretations, impositions, and indoctrinations.
Human Relationship with Truth:
The text suggests humans often avoid truth until it serves their interests, and its perceived value fluctuates based on necessity.
Types of Truths:
The author distinguishes between eight specific categories of truth: Religious, Moral, Legal, Common-sense, Academic, Intuition, Survival, and Gut Truth.
Summary of Text
According to Generative AI, the text discusses the concept of choice, linking it to assumptions about free will and the individual’s power to understand and interpret truth. It emphasizes that truth requires evidential proof and questions its nature without a moral compass or legal binding. The text also highlights how humans often avoid truth until it serves their purpose and notes that truth is perceived differently by the weak and powerful. Finally, it differentiates between various “Types of Truths,” including Religious, Moral, Legal, Common-sense, Academic, Intuition, Survival, and Gut Truth.
Explanation of Text
According to Generative AI, the text discusses the interconnectedness of choice, freewill, and truth, asserting that choice implies knowledge of truth and judgment of right and wrong. It emphasizes that truth requires evidential proof and questions the nature of truth without a moral compass or legal binding. The author suggests that humans often avoid truth until it serves their purpose and that definitions of truth vary based on individual power and perspective.
The text concludes by identifying and briefly listing eight distinct “Types of Truths”:
• Religious Truth (RT)
• Moral Truth (MT)
• Legal Truth (LT)
• Common-sense Truth (CT)
• Academic Truth (AT)
• Intuition Truth (IT)
• Survival Truth (ST)
• Gut Truth (GT)
Argument Raised by Philosopher
According to Generative AI interpretation, the text presents an argument about the nature of truth and its relationship with choice and free will.
Core Argument:
Choice and Freewill are tied to Truth:
The text asserts that choice and freewill are based on an assumption or presumption of one’s understanding of truth, or the ability to discern right from wrong, good from bad.
Truth Requires Evidential Proof:
Truth is presented as something that requires proof to be considered valid.
Challenges to Truth:
The text questions the nature of truth without a moral compass, legal binding, or good conscience, suggesting that without these, truth becomes susceptible to subjectivity, impositions, or indoctrinations.
Human Relationship with Truth:
Humans are depicted as having a complex and often self-serving relationship with truth, embracing it when convenient and running from it when it’s not.
Distinction of Truth Types:
A significant part of the argument emphasizes the importance of distinguishing between various “Types of Truths” and warns against erroneously mistaking one type for another (e.g., Religious Truth for Moral Truth, or Academic Truth for Intuition Truth).
Conclusion:
The argument highlights the multifaceted nature of truth, its dependence on evidential proof and moral/legal frameworks, and the human tendency to manipulate or avoid it, ultimately advocating for a clear understanding and differentiation of its various forms.
Attribution:
Writing attributed to “Al Philosopher Prince Israel Zaar 07022025,”