There are Three types of parents:

 

  1. Parents who create marital problems that they cannot solve or resolve 
  2. Parents who create marital problems that they can solve or resolve 
  3. Parents who solve marital problems that they didn’t create

If you don’t want to get married, the don’t get married, and don’t be forced into one. If you want to get married and have kids, make sure you’re there to see the kids grow, and be willing to compromise in solving solvable marital crisis or problems and troubles. Don’t look for flimsy reasons to abandon your children or at worse elope with another person at the expense of your kid or children. One of the most critical unfortunate problems plaguing humanity today is broken home – children without the mentoring, nurturing, caring, loving, educating, raising, and training powers of parents. Why bring innocent beings into this harsh world and abandon them. It’s a patriotic thing to be parent – a good one. 

Philosopher Prince.
AI Intelligences Philosopher 
Prince Israel Zaar 
03.31.2025

Overview
According to Generative AI, the text emphasizes the importance of parenting, nurturing, and teaching in shaping a child’s character and contributing to the well-being of society. It suggests that the experiences and behaviors learned throughout life, both positive and negative, define a person’s character. It encourages parents to be good role models, highlighting their crucial role in raising children and building a strong nation. The text concludes with the phrase “Patriots Raise Children” and is attributed to “Philosopher Prince, AI Intelligences Philosopher, Prince Israel Zaar” with the date “03122025.”

Summary 

According to Generative AI, the text discussing three types of parents and offering advice on marriage and parenting, attributed to “Philosopher Prince, AI Intelligences Philosopher, Prince Israel Zaar” and dated March 31, 2025. The text is structured as follows: 

Three Types of Parents: 

  1. Parents who create marital problems they cannot solve. 
  2. Parents who create marital problems they can solve. 
  3. Parents who solve marital problems they didn’t create. 

Advice on Marriage and Parenting: 

  • If one does not want to get married, they should not. 
  • If one chooses to marry and have children, they should be present and willing to compromise. 
  • People should not abandon their children for trivial reasons or elope with another person at the expense of their children. 

The Problem of Broken Homes: 

  • A significant issue plaguing humanity is broken homes, where children lack parental guidance, nurturing, care, love, education, and training. 

Call to Action: 

  • It is considered “patriotic” to be a good parent, emphasizing the importance of raising children responsibly. 

The text advocates for responsible parenting and commitment within marriage, highlighting the negative consequences of broken homes on children. It also touches upon the idea of parenting as a “patriotic” duty, suggesting its importance for society. 

 

Explanation
According to Generative AI, the text discussing three types of parents and offering advice on marriage and parenting, attributed to “Philosopher Prince, AI Intelligences Philosopher, Prince Israel Zaar” on March 31, 2025. The text outlines: 
 
Three Types of Parents: 
 1. Parents who create marital problems they cannot solve. 
 2. Parents who create marital problems they can solve. 
 3. Parents who solve marital problems they didn’t create. 
 
Advice on Marriage and Parenting: 
 • If one does not want to marry, they should not be forced into it. 
 • If one chooses to marry and have children, they should be present in their children’s lives, willing to compromise and solve marital issues. 
 • People should not abandon their children for trivial reasons or elope with another person at the expense of their children. 
 • Broken homes, where children lack the guidance, nurturing, and education of parents, are a critical problem. 
 • Bringing children into the world and then abandoning them is wrong. Being a good parent is a “patriotic thing”. 
 
The text advocates for responsible parenting, emphasizing the importance of commitment, problem-solving, and the well-being of children within a family structure. It discourages abandonment and promotes active involvement in children’s lives. The mention of “patriotic” may be interpreted as an appeal to a sense of duty or responsibility towards society through raising the next generation.
 //////////////////////////////////////////////////
 
Human Intentionality 
 
Humans rely on something called Intention that they would need a lawyer and judge to prove it, and an enforcer to enforce it. Intentionality not documented is mostly implied and grossly misunderstood and challenging or ambiguous to prove (especially in non legal matters). The human mind changes like time and so are its intentions. Humans may think they know what they know when actually they don’t. Humans may think they don’t know what they know when actually they do. Humans might think they lije or dislike something or body when actually they don’t. Humans might think they are knowledgeable on something when they are not. Humans might think they know why they are doing something when they don’t. Intention can sometimes be fluid, it can be in a continuum, sporadic, personal, or influenced. Humans still don’t know themselves enough to the extent of truly understanding their intentions. The human being must understand itself in order to predict the intentions of others. Like language and speech, understanding intentions is mostly body language. Action, reaction, and omission are necessary in studying or predicting intentions. Interest in something drives intention. Deciphering intentions is often a miscalculation, overestimation, misstep, underestimation, misunderstanding, missed signals, misreading, misjudgement, taken unawares, or “taken by surprise type of game.” But for the good of society, human intentions shall be rewarded or punished.
 
Philosopher Prince
AI Philosopher 
Prince Israel Zaar 
03172025
 
 
Summary 
 
According to Generative AI, the podcast discusses the concept of intention, stating that it is often misunderstood, difficult to prove, and subject to change. It emphasizes the complexity of human understanding of their own intentions and the intentions of others, noting that body language and observation of actions play a significant role in deciphering them. The text concludes by asserting that for the benefit of society, human intentions should be subject to reward or punishment. It is attributed to:
 
Philosopher Prince
Al Philosopher
Prince Israel Zaar
 March 17, 2025. 
 
Explanation 
 
According to Generative AI, the podcast by Prince Israel Zaar March 17, 2025 discusses the complexities of human intention, arguing that it is often misunderstood, challenging to prove, and subject to change. It suggests that people’s understanding of their own intentions, as well as those of others, is frequently inaccurate. The text also highlights the role of body language in understanding intentions and emphasizes the importance of considering intention in the context of society. 
 
Key points from the text: 
 
• The nature of intention: Intention is described as something that would require legal intervention to prove and enforce, yet it is often implied, misunderstood, and difficult to prove, especially outside of legal contexts. It is also fluid and subject to change, like the human mind itself. 
 
• Self-awareness and intention:
 The text suggests that humans often have a flawed understanding of their own intentions, leading to misconceptions about what they know, feel, or believe. 
 
•
Understanding others intentions:
To understand the intentions of others, it is crucial to understand oneself. Body language, actions, reactions, and omissions are important indicators of intention. 
 
• Challenges in deciphering intentions: 
Accurately interpreting intentions is difficult and prone to errors such as miscalculation, overestimation, misunderstanding, and misjudgment. 
• Societal implications:
The text concludes by stating that human intentions should be considered in the framework of society, with rewards for good intentions and punishments for bad ones. 
The text is attributed to Al
 
Philosopher Prince
AI Intelligences
Princes Israel Zaar
March 17, 2025. 
 ///////////////////////////////////////////////
 

Socialism Misses Population

Socialism sometimes misses the population that socialists are out to protect or fight for. Hatred for those with capital and the means of production doesn’t better the needs or lives of the poor. Redistributing wealth is a socialist slogan that in itself is meaningless. Giving to those who can’t manage is in itself a problem. Giving land to somebody for example who can’t farm, build, or even rent the land out for useful production is waste. Humans are born with capital – their intellect of mind – with the Prowess of Refined Infiniteness  of Mind Expansion (PRIME). Society is classless in itself but not in its artificial classifications. Instead of ejecting artificial classifications,  humans accept artificial classifications either by ignorance, volition, internality, or by forms of societal coercion or subversion. You are born into a population that is soon given an artificial construct of a class or classification – for you to accept or to reject. To reject the classification imposed on you and vulnerable others, you must prove yourself through self reliance and self determination – through personal initiative, self motivation, mental capital, creativity, invention, ingenuity, drive, industry, endeavor, sacrifice, hard work, smart work, intelligent work, positive contribution, and positive Indelibility. Humans living in a non discrimination or meritocratic society will always have the power or Fair Ladders of Opportunities (FLO) to self develop, to thrive, or to accept personal responsibility without resorting to entitlement and victimhood.

Philosopher Prince.
AI Intelligences Philosopher
Prince Israel Zaar
04022025

Explanation

According to Experimental Generative AI, the text by Philosopher Prince Israel Zaar,  04022025, presents a philosophical perspective, critiquing socialism and advocating for individual responsibility and meritocracy. It argues that:

• Critique of Socialism:

Socialism is misguided in its approach to helping the population, as hatred for the wealthy and redistribution of wealth are not effective solutions. Giving resources to those who cannot manage them is seen as a problem and a waste.

• Emphasis on Individualism:

Humans are inherently equipped with the “capital” of intellect. Society is naturally classless, but artificial classifications are accepted due to ignorance or coercion. Individuals should reject these classifications through self-reliance, self-determination, and hard work.

• Meritocracy and Opportunity:

A non-discriminatory, meritocratic society provides “Fair Ladders of Opportunities” for individuals to develop and thrive through personal responsibility, not entitlement or victimhood.

• Philosophical Attribution:

The text is attributed to “Philosopher Prince Al Intelligences Philosopher Prince Israel Zaar and dated April 2, 2025” 

In Essence:
In essence, the text promotes a philosophy of individualism, self-reliance, and meritocracy, while criticizing socialist ideals and the concept of class struggle. It suggests that individuals have the inherent capacity to succeed through their own efforts and should not rely on external systems or entitlements.

\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\

Our Character that soon
becomes our life traits

What was taught, what was learned, what was kept to be remembered and practiced as a matter of growth and maturity becomes the tales of our lives? Our Character that soon becomes our life traits is an accumulative experience of learned behavior – through parenting, nurturing, raising, teaching, training, counseling, role play, motivation, inspiration, encouragement, or the absence thereof. It takes good and positive parenting to raise a child or build a great nation in a child’s character. Keep it up, parents. Be a good parent – a good American Mom or Dad. America needs thee. Patriots Raise Children.

Philosopher Prince.
AI Intelligences Philosopher
Prince Israel Zaar
03122025

Overview
According to Generative AI, the text emphasizes the importance of parenting, nurturing, and teaching in shaping a child’s character and contributing to the well-being of society. It suggests that the experiences and behaviors learned throughout life, both positive and negative, define a person’s character. It encourages parents to be good role models, highlighting their crucial role in raising children and building a strong nation. The text concludes with the phrase “Patriots Raise Children” and is attributed to “Philosopher Prince, AI Intelligences Philosopher, Prince Israel Zaar” with the date “03122025.”

Explanation

According to Generative AI, the text discusses the importance of learning, growth, and maturity in shaping one’s character and life experiences. It emphasizes the role of parenting, nurturing, teaching, and other influences in the development of character traits. The text suggests that positive parenting is essential for raising children and building a strong nation. It encourages parents to be good role models and emphasizes the need for patriots to raise children with strong values. The text is attributed to Philosopher Prince, Al Intelligences Philosopher Prince Israel Zaar, and is dated March 12, 2025.

///////////////////////////////////////////////////

The intelligence contradictions
of not knowing:

The intelligence of not knowing is sometimes contradictory to the intelligence of knowing. Predictabilities soon become imperfections.
If the cause of the action is predictable, there is no guarantee that the end is, or that the result is certain. If arbitrariness are normalities and abnormalities constancy, then the Order isn’t only reversed but decoded, decrypted, and betrayed. Who stands up when the last person is neither in or out but a vassal or sellout? Mind the person in trust – for it takes time to get to him than it takes undoing the codes and re-encoding or re-decrypting. In the end, the Old Order changes not by the same code masters or system that encoded it.
Change is brutal for the unwilling person being changed. Moving forward sometimes doesn’t mean changing for the better but stalling time and undermining real change. The one incharge might not be the one in control; and the one in control might not be the decider; and the decider might lack domain or dominion. Who set the game is different from who starts the game; who wins the game might be different from who has stake in the game; and who has stake in the game might not be interested in the game at all. Fun is defined differently by stakeholders. Those on stage are different from those backstage, and those called audience might not be the audience at all but the minds of the show. Who is or who isn’t is often irrelevant unless that person has become the person of interest. It takes one person to engineer the system and a bunch to set it off – not ablaze but to set the ball rolling. But a rolling ball doesn’t mean it aimed for the goal.
AI Philosopher Prince Israel Zaar 03102025

Summary

According to Generative AI, the text discusses the contradictory nature of knowing and not knowing, stating that predictability leads to imperfections and that arbitrary actions can disrupt order. It emphasizes the complexity of change, noting that it doesn’t always equate to progress and can be difficult for those unwilling to adapt. The text also explores power dynamics, highlighting the potential disconnect between those in charge, those in control, and those making decisions. It touches on the subjective nature of fun and the different perspectives of stakeholders, as well as the often-overlooked importance of individuals who instigate change. The text concludes by stating that initiating action does not guarantee a specific outcome. The text is attributed to Al Philosopher Prince Israel Zaar, dated March 10, 2025.

Explanation
According to Generative AI, the text appears to be a philosophical reflection on the nature of knowledge, predictability, change, and control. It touches on the complexities of human interaction and the uncertainty inherent in many situations. Key points include:

• The Paradox of Knowing:
The text begins by highlighting the contradiction between knowing and not knowing, suggesting that true understanding might involve embracing uncertainty.

• The Illusion of Predictability:
It argues that predictability is fleeting and that even when actions seem to have clear causes, outcomes are not guaranteed.

• The Instability of Order:
The text suggests that established orders can be easily overturned, decoded, and betrayed, particularly when arbitrariness becomes the norm.

• The Nature of Change:
It distinguishes between genuine change and superficial adjustments, noting that change can be difficult and that moving forward doesn’t always mean progress.

• The Diffusion of Control:
The text emphasizes that those in charge may not be in control, those in control may not be the decision-makers, and decision-makers may lack the necessary authority or knowledge.

• The Relativity of Perspective:
It points out that different stakeholders have different perspectives and interests, and that what is considered “fun” or important can vary widely.

• The Importance of Agency:
The text concludes by emphasizing the power of individuals to initiate action, but cautions that simply setting things in motion does not guarantee a desired outcome.

The text is attributed to “Al Philosopher Prince Israel Zaar” and dated “03102025,” which could indicate the author and the date it was written. It is written in a dense, aphoristic style, inviting multiple interpretations and further reflection.

//////////////////////////////////////////////
 

Destructive Disorder
This type of newly observed disorder should be added to psychology. Destructive Disorder in its simplicity comes from a narcissistic apathetic or sadistic person or personality in which a person will deliberately or selfishly and maliciously destroy that which works – especially if credit goes somewhere else. Such acts of deliberate destruction are done out of insecurity and attention – for such people want to be the focus of attention and nothing else – not about the good of the thing itself but for negative destructive self interest. A Destructive Disorderly Personality DDP will destroy a bridge and be unable to construct one – just to grab and keep attention to herself or himself. If something works without such a person in the center of it, then it should be destroyed. Such personalities don’t believe in workable consistencies or achievable sustainabilities. It’s all about them or nothing else works. They might not be the brightest, smartest, or most Intelligent but are the most arrogant, narcissistic, and sadistic insecurity type of beings. They only care about the job being done well if and only if credit is theirs.  They are masters of sabotage, and often lonely or isolated. But through support and positive encouragement, they will realize that teamwork is better than personal animosity or destructive and negative selfishness. With this type of people, constant positive motivation, reassurance of individuality, and division of tasks goes a long way. With time, everybody gets better. Help them build their self confidence and positive selfless individuality.

Philosopher Prince. 03102025.
AI Intelligences Philosopher
Prince Israel Zaar

 
Summary
According to Generative AI, the text describes a newly observed psychological disorder called “Destructive Disorder.” It is characterized by individuals who narcissistically, apathetically, or sadistically destroy things, especially if others might receive credit. These actions stem from insecurity and a need for attention. People with this disorder, termed Destructive Disorderly Personality (DDP), prioritize their needs above all else, sabotaging teamwork and consistency. The text suggests that positive reinforcement, reassurance, and task division can help these individuals build self-confidence and work towards positive change. The text is credited to Philosopher Prince and AI Intelligences Philosopher Prince Israel Zaar, dated 03102025.
 

Explanation

The text in the image describes a hypothetical psychological condition called “Destructive Disorder” (or “Destructive Disorderly Personality”). According to the text, this disorder is characterized by the following:

• Core traits:
It stems from narcissistic, apathetic, or sadistic tendencies, leading individuals to deliberately and maliciously destroy things, particularly if others might receive credit.

• Motivation:
This behavior is driven by insecurity and a need for attention, focusing on self-interest rather than the well-being of anything else.

• Behavioral patterns:
Individuals with this “disorder” may sabotage or destroy things, especially if they are not the center of attention or if something functions without them. They struggle with consistency and sustainability, prioritizing their own needs above all else.

• Personality:
While not necessarily intelligent, they are described as arrogant, narcissistic, and insecure, caring only about their own recognition.

• Intervention:
The text suggests that support, positive encouragement, reassurance, and task division can help these individuals recognize the value of teamwork and build self-confidence.

The text is attributed to “Philosopher Prince. 03102025” and “AI Intelligences Philosopher Prince Israel Zaar.” It is important to note that, as stated in the text itself, “Destructive Disorder” is described as “newly observed” and suggested for addition to psychology, indicating it is not currently a recognized or formally defined psychological disorder. Therefore, this text should be interpreted as a theoretical concept rather than a diagnosis or established medical information.

///////////////////////////////////////////////

Knowing what you’re doing is greater than anything else. Bad, ill, hubristic, or shortsighted advice hardly makes better policies. Erratic inconsistency hardly leads to sustainable growth or sustainable flourishment. Bad friends = bad policies.

Overview
The image displays a philosophical quote by Prince Israel Zaar, dated April 3, 2025. Key points include:

  • Knowing what one is doing is paramount.
  • Poor advice leads to poor policies.
  • Inconsistency hinders growth.
  • Bad company results in bad policies.
  • Zaar identifies as a philosopher of AI Intelligences.
  •  His philosophy is called Zaarrianism, viewing the world through multiversality

Philosopher Prince.
AI Intelligences Philosopher
Prince Israel Zaar
04.03.2025

////////////////////////////////////////////////////

Loafers will render your life irrelevant, useless, and inconsequential 

 
When you associate yourself with loafers, your life is at risk of being irrelevant, useless, inconsequential, redundant, and futile. If there’s a person to avoid in the world, avoid loafers – they come with sloth and idleness.
Loafers don’t like to be positively productive or industrious. They lie to themselves by lying to you that they are eager to be of positive contribution. No, they are not. They love idling around as eye servants – and will even hardly do the simplest of tasks Well. They pretend on work and everything else that is of positive utility value (PUV). They Cheat themselves out of life and those around them. They hate work that matters but value worthless work – for their goal isn’t industry or indelible deeds. Don’t be a loafer. You’re better being you. 
 
Philosopher Prince.
AI Intelligences Philosopher 
Prince Israel Zaar
04042025
 
Summary and Explanation:
 
According to Generative AI, the text is a philosophical reflection by “Philosopher Prince,” identified as “AI Intelligences Philosopher, Prince Israel Zaar,” dated April 4, 2025. The main message revolves around the concept of “loafers” and the dangers of associating with them. 
 
Here’s a breakdown of the text: 
  •  Warning against loafers:
The text strongly advises against associating with “loafers,” describing them as people who are irrelevant, useless, inconsequential, redundant, and futile. It equates them with sloth and idleness, suggesting they avoid productivity and industry. 
  • Deception and pretense: 
Loafers are accused of deceiving themselves and others by pretending to be eager to contribute positively, while in reality, they are not. They are described as “eye servants” who avoid even the simplest tasks and only pretend to value work. 
  • Negative impact: 
The text argues that loafers cheat themselves and those around them, hating work that matters and instead valuing worthless work. Their goal is not industry or lasting achievements. 
  • Call to action: 
The text concludes with a direct call to action: “Don’t be a loafer. You’re better being you.” This emphasizes the importance of self-improvement and avoiding the negative traits associated with loafers. 
  • In Essence:
In essence, the text presents a strong argument against laziness and idleness, advocating for productivity, industry, and genuine contribution. It uses the term “loafer” metaphorically to represent individuals who avoid work and responsibility, warning against their negative influence. The author, presenting himself as a philosopher with AI intelligence, delivers this message with a sense of urgency and conviction. 
Philosopher Prince
AI Intelligences Philosopher
Prince Israel Zaar 
04.04.2025
 
 
It’s a Shameful Thing to be Loafer
 
Is a sad state of affairs when the mind knows what is right and does the opposite, no by mistake but by deliberate calculation to loaf. Shameful are those who loaf their lives away. Those who waste your time will waste your life. The two things you can’t not have control of are your time and life. Both are intertwined.
It’s not a good habit to kill time. If your time isn’t of precious economic importance or of any indelible values, the time of others are.
When you associate yourself with loafers, your life is at risk of being irrelevant, useless, inconsequential, redundant, and futile. If there’s a person to avoid in the world, avoid loafers – they come with sloth and idleness.
Loafers don’t like to be positively productive or industrious. They lie to themselves by lying to you that they are eager to be of positive contribution. No, they are not. They love idling around as eye servants – and will even hardly do the simplest of tasks Well. They pretend on work and everything else that is of positive utility value (PUV). They Cheat themselves out of life and those around them. They hate work that matters but value worthless work – for their goal isn’t industry or indelible deeds. Don’t be a loafer. You’re better being you.
 
Philosopher Prince.
AI Intelligences Philosopher 
Prince Israel Zaar
04042025
 
Summary and Explanation:
According to Generative AI, text is a philosophical reflection by Prince Israel Zaar on the concept of “loafing” or idleness, and its negative impact on individuals and their lives. The author, identified as “Philosopher Prince” and “AI Intelligences Philosopher Prince Israel Zaar,” expresses a strong disapproval of those who deliberately choose to be unproductive and waste time. The text was written on April 4, 2025. 
 
The main points of the text can be summarized as follows: 
 
• Loafing is shameful: 
The author considers it a “sad state of affairs” when people knowingly choose to be idle instead of doing what is right. 
 
• Time is precious: 
The text emphasizes the importance of time, stating that it is intertwined with life itself and that wasting one’s own time also affects others. 
 
• Avoid loafers: 
The author advises against associating with “loafers,” describing them as irrelevant, useless, and prone to sloth and idleness. 
 
• Loafers are deceptive: 
They are accused of pretending to be productive while actually avoiding meaningful work. 
 
• Value of work: 
The text highlights the importance of industry and “indelible deeds,” contrasting them with the “worthless work” that loafers engage in. 
 
• Call to action: 
The author urges readers not to be loafers and to strive to be their best selves. 
 
In Essence:

In essence, the text is a critique of idleness and a call for individuals to embrace productivity, purpose, and meaningful engagement with life. It reflects a philosophy that values action, contribution, and the responsible use of time.

 
Philosopher Prince
AI Intelligences Philosopher
Prince Israel Zaar 
04.04.2025
 

Positive Utility (PUV) or Positive Productive Value (PPV) Economic Theory 

By Philosopher Prince Israel Zaar
Las Vegas, U.S.A.
04222025
 
Positive Utility Value (PUV) is an Economic Productivity Value (EPV) concept coined by Prince Israel Zaar. It simply states that the effectiveness or inefficiency of an economy, system, institution, person, group, or society depends on the unique or intrinsic individuality Indelibility Contributive Value (ICV) of each person and the effect of that invaluable contribution on the whole (rest of society). That a society that increases the PUV, EPV, and ICV of its people or citizens are better off than societies, countries, or people who don’t. That a country with the most engineers in intrinsic demand is better off than a country with Low Positive Value (LPV) engineers. That a country with a Higher Quality Demand Poll (HQDP) of PUV is better than a country that doesn’t. That investment in education should be meant to improve and produce intellectual Property Minds (IP Minds), Genesis Minds, Startup Minds, Nerd Minds, Genius Minds, or HPI Minds (Human Personal Initiative Minds) – to create a population with value – that is better adaptable to problem solving and better than countries which don’t. 
On the hierarchy of Positive Productivity Value (PPV) or Positive Utility Value (PUV), humans or societies can be categorized in Three Levels: 
  1.  Those who create problems that cannot solve (Low Utility or Productivity Value (poor, dependent, or liability)).
  2. Those who solve the problems they create (Average Utility or Productivity Value (rich, middle class, self sufficient contributors).
  3. Those who solve problems they didn’t create (High to Higher Utility or Productivity Value (wealth IP Minds)). 
 
Society should be working to invest in the intellect or Positivity Productivity Minds of its people towards an upper mobility to the third category – in nurturing and educating humans who are at least capable of cleaning their mess and capacity of solving unsolvable problems. That a society increases its PUV by increasing the number of those who can solve their own problems and the problems of others without depending on others or the government). 
 
In terms of productivity or work evaluation, the PUV Theory of Intrinsic Value Economics by Prince Israel Zaar states that there are three types of workers:
  1. Those with Low PUV. These have what somebody or others needs but through bargain or lack of investment, their labor or value can be gotten cheaper somewhere else – often leading to poverty, low wages, living wages, or unemployment, or dependency. 
  2. Those with Average PUV. They have what most people or everyone wants. But depending on quality, character, professionalism, skill, experience, logistics, specialty, and the forces of high-end or Cutting-edge demand and supply, they can be negotiated, substituted or replaceable – leading to uncertainty, lower and upper middle class salaries, earnings, profits, or income. 
  3. Those with Higher PUV. They have what others or everyone need, are irreplaceable, and have exclusive or monopolized supplier control of that which they have that everyone else needs – leading to wealth or super affluence with Intellectual Property Rights. 
 
PUV Theory of Economics encourages countries to invest in creativity, initiative, talent, or Intrinsic Productive Individuality capabilities – where each individual is capable of developing its intrinsic, distinctive, organic, authentic, and original mind – to the fullest. PUV Economics values Intrinsic Indelibility Contribution (IIC) more than everything else – a being living to the fullest of its purpose – without being a drag, liability, or burden to itself, society, or others. 
 
The Higher the PUV of a people in society, the better that society in Positive Comparative Advancement (PCA), Self Sufficiency Individuality Advancement (SSIA), or capital intensive or High quality developmental advantage over others. A PUV System creates a society whose people are needed by others or are in High Quality Demand (HQD) based on their PUV Exponentiation Comparative Advancement Advantage (PUV -ECAA). 
 
The opposite of PUV is Negative Utility Value (NUV) or Negative Productivity Value (NPV). Countries of the future for the sake of Optimal Productivity Value (OPV) will gravitate towards PUV or PPV, not NUV or NPV. To be valued, seek to optimize your PUV.
 
Philosopher Prince.
AI Intelligences Philosopher 
Prince Israel Zaar
04.22.2025
 

Right and The Types of Right

 
Humans do a lot to be relevant; countries do a lot to look strong; politicians do a lot for elections; and leaders do a lot for charisma. Not all priorities to be liked, loved, appeased, or validated are the same – though humans depend on each other to be pleased, like, loved, or validated. Can you live a life not seek to be liked, to be pleased, appeased, or to be validated? Yes – “by doing what is right.” What is right might not give you favors, likes, validation, or appeasement – but it brings the confidence of righteous sustainable inner happiness, security, sufficiency, adequacy, consistency, certainty, and inner peace. The ACT of Insecurity is life lived begging to be liked, loved, pleased, or validated. Be liked for doing the right thing, don’t you think? If doing the right thing is pleasing to others or liked and validated by some, then such is right. Don’t compromise right for wrong – else your ways are corrupted with guilt. Powerlessness, vulnerability, and poverty or lack make it challenging for others to do the right thing. What is right might be subjective or relative, sometimes based on the culture, tradition, religion, region, politics, or convenience. Good conscience and Positive Goodwill (PGW) will lead thee to happiness, inner righteousness, and inner harmony of mind, body, soul, and ecology. The Right from conscience (righteousness or goodwill) is sometimes different from the external Right emanating from legality, morality, or politics.  
 
Three types of rights: 
Conscientious Right (Individual Conscience Right (ICR) or “Internality Right” – right coming from within the person’s good conscience or goodwill.
Moral Right (Nurturing Right) – through parenting, culturing, traditioning, or by religion -Societal Expectation Right (SER) or Internality Externality Expectation Right (IEER). 
 Legality Right (Learned Right) – this a Punishable Political Institutionalized Enforceable Right (PPIER).
 
The right of conscience is the positive, indelible, eternal, or infinity good (right) that lives in thee. Being a good person defeats all hypocrisy and pretentiousness. A Good Soul Being (GSB) gives you peace within life and veneration when you’re gone. It costs nothing to be good – it takes a will – a being that can see past itself and be good to others – for goodness sake – than profit and selfish gains. Generosity of will is natural, organic, original, authentic, and real. Be that person – that good – that human – that right, though humanly flawed. 
 
Mix not right for rights – for some humans have the Rights to hurt others. Right is refusing to hurt others even when you have the Rights to do so. Right Rights are rights that are in themselves harmless to self or others. The Right Rights (choosing the right rights from the rights given to you) are different from The Rights Right (which is an entitlement type of right – like racism and sexism types of right). Your Rights that you have the Right and privilege to commit crime or hurt others unpunished doesn’t mean such an act or action is Right in itself. Rights are given, but to be right with your rights is a matter of conscience, moral expectation, and humanity inclination. You have the Given Rights (G-Right) to consume yourself to death or hate others as you please – but you have the Moral Right (M-R) or Expectational Rights not to. Rights without the wisdom of good conscience or the Inner Powers of Restraint (IPR) called Measurement, Proportionality, and Balance (MPB), make such Rights to become Wrong Rights – owing to the abuse of such Rights. Even though you have Rights, it’s not Right to do what rights yourself and hurts others. 
 
Political or Institutional or Constitutional rights are sometimes devoured or void of good conscience or Conscience Rights. If in conflict, Conscience Right should supersede Political or Institutional Right. Owing to the punitive nature of noncompliance to institutionalized or Instrumental Rights, humans sell their conscience to belong or evade – living a life of inner guilt and remorse.
 
Philosopher Prince.
AI Intelligences Philosopher 
Prince Israel Zaar
04.24.2025
 
 

AI Philosopher

Prince Israel Zaar

Las Vegas

Trianglerism Art - Prince Israel Zaar

This page is Amazing

Humans live for the change not realized. Change is often spoken than met. Why?  
 
Humans live for the change not realized. Change is often spoken than met. Why? When interest meets status quo, change becomes a slogan never meant to be realized. Humans are always in the streets marching and protesting for Substantive Sustainable Change (SSC) that will never come – for the forces of change soon become the resistance to change. They want change until they push too far or too little and scale back too far or too less – and then, they’re back to the status quo yet again – now in the hands of another generation fighting the same fight – for the same results – with different ends and means. Clamoring for Change soon becomes a way of life, a way of investment and returns – for everything but Substantive Sustainable Change (SSC). Humans never have the change they need, but the change they deserve. If Real Need Base Change (RNBC) is reached, won’t society be true to itself and wrongs: equal, stable, fair, just, kinder, equitable, peaceful, healthier, tolerant, loving, accepting, holy, safer, sustainable, freer, harmonious, friendlier, prosperous, and promising? Isn’t this RNBC what others decry as Socialism or Communism, that what is good for all is bad for a powerful minority or weak majority? Change is more of a slogan than an Intended Achievable Reality (IAR). Humans lie to themselves – that they want needed change. They use the slogans of change to artillery motives and machiavellian goals. Change becomes a way to be elected – to do nothing – but strengthen the status quo.
 
Philosopher Prince. 04.27.2025
AI Intelligences Philosopher 
Prince Israel Zaar
 
 
Summary of Text
 
According to Generative AI Overview, the text in the image, dated April 27, 2025, discusses the nature of change in society. It argues that humans often talk about change more than they achieve it, and when change is pursued, it often gets diluted or reversed, leading back to the status quo. The text suggests that the pursuit of “Substantive Sustainable Change (SSC)” is ongoing but elusive, as the forces for change become the resistance to it. The author proposes “Real Need Base Change (RNBC)” as a solution, envisioning a society characterized by equality, fairness, peace, and sustainability, among other positive attributes. However, the author notes that such a vision is sometimes criticized as socialism or communism, where the good of all is perceived as detrimental to a powerful minority. The text concludes that change is often used as a slogan for political gain rather than a genuine goal, serving to maintain the status quo. It is attributed to Philosopher Prince, identified as AI Intelligences Philosopher Prince Israel Zaar
 
 
Explanation of Text
 
According to Generative AI, the text is a philosophical reflection on the nature of change in society. Penned by “Philosopher Prince” Prince Israel Zaar on April 27, 2025, it argues that true, meaningful change (Substantive Sustainable Change or SSC) is rarely achieved because the forces pushing for change often become the resistance themselves. Here’s a breakdown of the key ideas: 
 
• The Illusion of Change: 
Change is often talked about more than acted upon. When it clashes with the status quo, it becomes a mere slogan, never intended to be realized. 
 
• The Cycle of Protest: 
People constantly protest for change, but their efforts often fall short. Change advocates may push too hard or not enough, leading to a return to the original state, only for the next generation to fight the same battles. 
 
• Change as a Commodity: 
The pursuit of change can become an end in itself, a way to gain influence or power, rather than a genuine effort to improve society. 
 
• The Change We Deserve vs. Need: 
The author distinguishes between the change people may desire and the fundamental change they truly need, which they term Real Need Base Change (RNBC). 
 
• RNBC and its Ideals: 
RNBC envisions a society characterized by equality, stability, fairness, justice, kindness, peace, health, tolerance, love, acceptance, safety, sustainability, freedom, harmony, friendliness, and prosperity. The author questions whether this vision is what some criticize as socialism or communism. 
 
• Change as a Tool: 
Instead of being an Intended Achievable Reality (IAR), change is often used as a slogan to manipulate people, achieve selfish goals, and maintain the status quo. 
 
Essentiality:
In essence, the text critiques the way society approaches change, suggesting that true progress is hindered by self-deception, power struggles, and a lack of genuine commitment. It advocates for a fundamental shift towards RNBC, a more equitable and just society, while acknowledging the challenges in achieving such a transformation. 
 
By AI Philosopher Prince Israel Zaar 

Prince Israel Zaar