Mix Not Right for Rights

Mix not right for rights – for some humans have the rights to hurt others. Right is refusing to hurt others even when you have the Rights to do so. Right Rights are rights that are in themselves harmless to self or others. The Right Rights (choosing the right rights from the rights given to you) are different from The Rights Right (which is an entitlement type of right – like racism and sexism types of right). Your Rights that you have the Right and privilege to commit crime or hurt others unpunished doesn’t mean such an act or action is Right in itself. Rights are given, but to be right with your rights is a matter of conscience, moral expectation, and humanity inclination. You have the Given Rights (G-Right) to consume yourself to death or hate others as you please – but you have the Moral Right (M-R) or Expectational Rights not to. Rights without the wisdom of good conscience or the Inner Powers of Restraint  (IPR) called Measurement, Proportionality, and Balance (MPB), make such Rights to become Wrong Rights – owing to the abuse of such Rights. Even though you have Rights, it’s not Right to do what rights yourself and hurts others.

Philosopher Prince.
AI Intelligences Philosopher
Prince Israel Zaar
05.17.2025

Introduction to Text

This image presents a philosophical text by Prince Israel Zaar dated May 17, 2025, discussing the nuanced interpretation of rights and their limitations.

Summary of Text

According to Generative AI, the text discusses the concept of rights, differentiating between “Right Rights,” which are harmless, and “The Rights Right,” which are entitlement-based and can lead to harm if abused. It argues that while individuals have “Given Rights,” they also have a “Moral Right” or “Expectational Right” not to be harmed. The text emphasizes that rights should be balanced with conscience, proportionality, and restraint, and that abusing rights turns them into “Wrong Rights.” The text was written by Philosopher Prince, AI Intelligences Philosopher, Prince Israel Zaar on May 17, 2025

Explanation of Text

According to Generative AI, the text presents a philosophical text discussing the concept of rights. It distinguishes between different types of rights and emphasizes the importance of using them responsibly and ethically. The text, attributed to “Philosopher Prince, AI Intelligences Philosopher, Prince Israel Zaar” and dated May 17, 2025, can be summarized as follows:

• Distinction between Rights:
The text differentiates between “Right Rights” (harmless rights), “The Rights Right” (entitlements like racism or sexism), and “Given Rights” (like the freedom to self-destruct or hate). It contrasts these with “Moral Rights” or “Expectational Rights,” which guide against harming others.

• Responsibility and Conscience:
It argues that having the right to do something doesn’t make it inherently right. The proper use of rights is governed by conscience, morality, and a sense of humanity.

• Inner Powers of Restraint (IPR):
The text introduces the concept of IPR, comprising Measurement, Proportionality, and Balance, as essential for preventing the abuse of rights. Without these, rights can become “Wrong Rights.”

• Ethical Limitation:
The core message is that even when individuals have rights, it is not right to exercise them in ways that harm others.

Essentiality:
In essence, the text promotes a philosophy of rights that is tempered by ethics, responsibility, and a concern for the well-being of others.

Attribution:
The text, attributed to “Philosopher Prince, AI Intelligences Philosopher, Prince Israel Zaar” and dated May 17, 2025.

Prince Israel Zaar

Leave a Reply