Longevity is Human

 

What kills or destroys humans should have saved and redeemed them. Ironically, Humans work against their wellbeing mentally, physically, spiritually, and ecologically until the days of their deaths. The mistakes humans do and the accidents they create, the forced errors they make, adamant to good counsel, or their arrogant ignorance living for the wrong reasons, believing in the wrongfulness of things, abet them dying for the wrong reason. Human death was supposed to be natural, but it’s often self inflicted by desires, wants, pride, needs, pleasure, leisure, entertainment, spite, addictions, sadism, anger, hate, narcissism, ego, shame, guilt, insecurity, insufficiency, inadequacy, inequality, inequities, instabilities, inevitabilities, inconsistencies, inaccuracies, or humans inability to use their intellect, body, soul, conscience, and environment healthily, sustainably, or conducively. Advancements in science and technologies were supposed to prolong life, but in most instances, it shortens life. Human artificial unhealthy consumptions have replaced natural healthy consumptions. Gadgets made by humans to better improve life are made prone with fatal errors and fatal decisions – by apathetic reckless endangered humans. Weapons made for self protection are used by humans to kill innocent humans. The more their proud Cutting-edge Scientific Inventions or Innovations, the more wars they fight to test their mass weapons of death. Their education promotes stark ignorance of self and life, and hatred for the other. Their religions, traditions, and cultures or politics are sometimes repugnant to natural justice and cruelly deadly at best in conflicts or wars.

Philosopher Prince.
AI Intelligences Philosopher
Prince Israel Zaar
07142025

Overview of Text 

According to Generative AI interpretation, the provided text, attributed to “Al Philosopher Prince Israel Zaar 07142025,” presents a critique of humanity, arguing that:

• Humans actively work against their own well-being and often inflict death upon themselves through desires, negative emotions, and poor choices.

• Advancements in science and technology, meant to prolong life, often have the opposite effect, and human-made gadgets and weapons are used destructively.

• Modern education, religions, traditions, cultures, and politics are criticized for promoting ignorance, hatred, and injustice, leading to conflict and war.

Simplification of Text 

According to Generative AI interpretation, the  provided text, attributed to Al Philosopher Prince Israel Zaar on July 14, 2025, argues that humans ironically work against their own well-being and accelerate their demise, despite advancements meant to improve life.

• Self-Inflicted Harm: 

Human death, intended to be natural, is often self-inflicted due to negative desires, emotions, and an inability to live healthily and sustainably.

• Technological Irony: 

Scientific and technological advancements, meant to prolong life, often lead to shorter lives due to unhealthy consumption and flawed human decisions in creating and utilizing tools and weapons.

• Societal Decay: 

Education, religion, traditions, cultures, and politics are presented as promoting ignorance, hatred, and conflict, leading to wars and injustice.

Summary of Text 

According to Generative AI interpretation, the text argues that humans ironically work against their own well-being, inflicting suffering and shortening their lives through self-destructive desires, technological misuse, unhealthy consumption, and the use of weapons. It criticizes human ignorance, flawed education, and problematic aspects of religion, tradition, culture, and politics, suggesting these contribute to conflict and injustice, ultimately leading to death for the wrong reasons.

Explanation of Text 

According to Generative AI interpretation, the text, titled “What kills or destroys humans should have saved and redeemed them” by Al Philosopher Prince Israel Zaar, argues that humanity actively works against its own well-being and often inflicts its own demise. It suggests that human death, which should be natural, is frequently self-inflicted due to negative emotions and desires like pride, anger, and ego. The author criticizes advancements in science and technology for shortening rather than prolonging life, the replacement of healthy consumptions with artificial ones, and the misuse of inventions like gadgets and weapons for destructive purposes. The text also critiques modern education for promoting ignorance and hatred, and religious/cultural/political systems for being unjust or leading to conflict.

Other interpretations of Text 

The text, attributed to “Al Philosopher Prince Israel Zaar 07142025,” argues that humans ironically work against their own well-being and often inflict their own demise. The author posits that despite advancements in science and technology, human choices related to desires, unhealthy consumption, and self-inflicted errors lead to a shorter, less fulfilling life. The text criticizes the use of inventions for destructive purposes (like weapons), and laments how education, religion, and politics can promote ignorance and conflict instead of natural justice.

What Does this Text Mean?

The text, attributed to “Al Philosopher Prince Israel Zaar,” presents a philosophical critique of humanity, arguing that humans actively work against their own well-being and shorten their lives despite advancements meant to improve them.

The core message conveys the following ideas: 

• Self-inflicted harm: 

Human death, though natural, is often hastened by negative traits and behaviors like desires, pride, addictions, hate, and the inability to use intellect and conscience effectively.

• Technological paradox: 

Scientific and technological advancements, intended to prolong life, often lead to its shortening due to unhealthy consumption patterns and flawed creations (e.g., gadgets with fatal errors, weapons used for harm instead of protection).

• Societal flaws: 

Human education, religions, traditions, cultures, and politics are criticized for promoting ignorance, hatred, and conflicts that are “cruelly deadly” and “repugnant to natural justice.”

Source Code:

[1] https://www.instagram.com/p/DDdIwOpvlbu/

Argument Presented in the Text

The argument presented in the text by Al Philosopher Prince Israel Zaar asserts that humans ironically work against their own well-being and shorten their lives despite advancements meant to improve them. The core argument is that human suffering and premature death are often self-inflicted due to negative desires, unhealthy consumptions, flawed inventions, and societal constructs like education, religion, and politics that promote ignorance, hatred, and conflict, ultimately leading to a departure from natural justice and healthy living.

Bullet Points from Text 

• Humans ironically work against their own well-being (mentally, physically, spiritually, ecologically) through mistakes, accidents, and arrogant ignorance.

• Human death, though natural, is often self-inflicted by desires, negative emotions (pride, hate, narcissism, etc.), and inability to use intellect, body, soul, conscience, and environment healthily.

• Advancements in science and technology, meant to prolong life, often shorten it due to unhealthy artificial consumptions replacing natural ones.

• Human-made gadgets, intended to improve life, are prone to fatal errors and decisions caused by human apathy and recklessness.

• Weapons, meant for self-protection, are used to kill innocent humans, and scientific inventions lead to wars to test weapons of mass destruction.

• Education, religions, traditions, cultures, and politics often promote ignorance, hatred, and are repugnant to natural justice, leading to deadly conflicts.

Attribution:

Writing attributed to “Al Philosopher Prince Israel Zaar 07142025”.

Leave a Reply