There Three Types of Humans in the AI world:
Humans who AI is going to delete, replace or render obsolete (humans low on HPI – Human Personal Inventiveness or innovativeness).
Humans who are going to work for the AI (System manager, directors, supervisors, or work fleet).
Humans who AI is going to work for (System designers or humans with higher levels of HPI – Human Personal Inventiveness or innovativeness).
In the Artificial Intelligence Age, there are those that AI consumes, there are those who consume AI, and there are those who are the creators and programmers or deployed of AI. If you’re not the creator of the AI with the Quantum Data Algorithms (QDA), you’re either consuming AI or it’s consuming you. If you’re not contributing to the development of AI or participating in its usage or deployment, you risk being replaced or rendered obsolete. Thy positive contribution is needed in shaping a Positive AI Future (PAIF). Be actively interactive with the New AI Models (NAIM) in order to be relevant. Fear of irrelevancy in the Artificial Intelligence Age shouldn’t evade thee. Be a vital contributor to the AI Age.
Philosopher Prince.
AI Intelligences Philosopher
Prince Israel Zaar
07132925
Overview of Text
According to Generative AI interpretation, this text, written by “AI Intelligences Philosopher Prince Israel Zaar,” outlines the author’s perspective on human roles in the Artificial Intelligence Age:
• Three Types of Humans:
The author categorizes humans in the AI world into three groups: those rendered obsolete by AI (low on “Human Personal Inventiveness or innovativeness” – HPI), those who work for AI, and those for whom AI works (high on HPI).
• The Creator/Consumer Dynamic:
The text emphasizes that in the AI Age, individuals are either creators/programmers of AI, consumers of AI, or being consumed by AI.
• Importance of Contribution:
It stresses the need for positive contributions to shape a “Positive AI Future” (PAIF) and encourages active interaction with “New AI Models” (NAIM) to avoid irrelevancy.
• Be a Vital Contributor:
The overarching message is to actively engage with AI development and deployment to remain relevant and avoid being replaced or rendered obsolete.
Other Interpretations of Text
According to Generative AI interpretation, this text, written by “Philosopher Prince Israel Zaar,” discusses the relationship between humans and AI, categorizing humans into three types in the AI world:
• Those rendered obsolete by AI:
Individuals with low Human Personal Inventiveness (HPI) will be deleted, replaced, or made obsolete by AI.
• Those working for AI:
This group includes system managers, directors, supervisors, or the general workforce who will operate under AI systems.
• Those AI works for:
This category comprises system designers and individuals with high HPI, indicating they create and innovate within the AI landscape.
• The text emphasizes active participation:
To remain relevant in the AI age, individuals must either create and deploy AI, or actively contribute to its development and usage to avoid being replaced or rendered obsolete.
Summary of Text
According to Generative AI interpretation, the text categorizes humans in the AI world into three types: those who will be made obsolete by AI due to low inventiveness, those who will work for AI in management or operational roles, and those for whom AI will work due to their high levels of inventiveness and design capabilities. It emphasizes the importance of contributing to AI development or deployment to avoid obsolescence and remain relevant in the Artificial Intelligence Age.
Explanation of Text
According to Generative AI interpretation, the text describes “The Three AI Humans (Personalities)” in the context of the Artificial Intelligence Age:
Humans to be replaced by AI: Those with low Human Personal Inventiveness or innovativeness (HPI).
Humans working for AI: System managers, directors, supervisors, or the work fleet.
Humans AI works for: System designers or individuals with high levels of HPI.
The text emphasizes that in the AI Age, individuals are either creators/deployers of AI, consumers of AI, or being consumed by AI. It stresses the importance of contributing positively to AI development and actively interacting with new AI models to remain relevant and avoid obsolescence. The author is identified as Philosopher Prince Israel Zaar.
What Does this Mean?
According to Generative AI interpretation, the image outlines a perspective on the future of human roles in the Artificial Intelligence (AI) world, categorizing humans into three types based on their relationship with AI, and emphasizing the importance of active engagement with AI to avoid obsolescence.
Three Types of Humans in the AI World:
Humans rendered obsolete by AI:
These are individuals with low Human Personal Inventiveness or Innovativeness (HPI), who AI is predicted to “delete, replace or render obsolete.”
Humans working for AI:
This category includes those who will manage, direct, supervise, or serve as a “work fleet” for AI systems.
Humans AI works for:
These are individuals with higher levels of HPI, such as “System designers,” for whom AI will serve as a tool or assistant.
Relevance in the AI Age:
The text stresses that in the Artificial Intelligence Age, individuals are either creators/deployers of AI (especially with “Quantum Data Algorithms – QDA”), consumers of AI, or being consumed/rendered obsolete by AI. It advocates for active participation and contribution to the development and deployment of AI (“Positive AI Future – PAIF”) and interaction with “New AI Models – NAIM” to maintain relevance and avoid the “fear of irrelevancy.” The overarching message is to become a “vital contributor to the AI Age.”
Argument Raised by Text
According to Generative AI interpretation, the central argument presented in the image is that in the Artificial Intelligence Age, humans will primarily fall into three categories: those replaced by AI, those who work for AI, and those for whom AI works. The overarching argument emphasizes the need for human contribution and active engagement with AI to remain relevant and avoid obsolescence.
This argument is structured as follows:
• Three Types of Humans in the AI World:
Obsolete Humans: Individuals with low Human Personal Inventiveness (HPI) or innovativeness who will be replaced or rendered obsolete by AI.
AI Workforce: Humans who will manage, direct, supervise, or form the work fleet for AI systems.
AI Beneficiaries/Designers: Individuals with higher levels of HPI who design AI systems or for whom AI works.
• The Dilemma of AI Consumption:
The text posits that if one is not a creator of AI (specifically with Quantum Data Algorithms), then one is either consuming AI or being consumed by it.
• Call to Action for Relevance:
It argues that positive contribution to a “Positive AI Future (PAIF)” and active interaction with “New AI Models (NAIM)” are crucial to avoid irrelevancy and become a vital contributor in the AI Age.
Attribution:
Written by “AI Intelligences Philosopher Prince Israel Zaar,” July 13, 2025.
