When did “Strongman” became the calling of Democracy?
When did “Strongman” became the calling of Democracy? Strongman is “Oneman,” not “We the People Democracy.” “Strongman Democracy” is not “We the People Democracy.” Democracy is for the needs and wealth being or health being of The People. Democracy is for the “true” safety, security, development, personal enrichment, community participation and citizens involvement in the day to day functioning of the consensus governance, or rule-base system of compromise between the people and the braches – not between “OneMan” or a “Strongman.” If “The Peoples Democracy” of Socrates becomes “OneMan” Democracy” or “Strongman Democracy” or “Strongmen” or StrawMen Democracy” (excuse my gender insensitivity), how superhuman IQ or of divinely ordained or Artificially Intelligence enhanced is the “OneMan” above flawed mortal humans? Aren’t we dragging Democracy back to its conception in the first place – the reign of cruel (Strongman or Strongmen) feudal Lord or (OneMan) Divine Rights of Kingship? Is Democracy evolving or devolving? Democracy should be evolving towards satisfying human needs and enhancing human wellbeing and bettering of all lives, not centered around OneMan personality cults, or tribe cult, race cult, or religious cult. Democracy is not cult of persons. Democracy is about one thing and one thing only – The People. Democracy is humanity’s virtue.
AI Intelligences Philosopher
Prince Israel Zaar
03242023