Developing Thy Inner or Internal AI
Away from the human primitive, natural, or biological intelligence, the Human being is born with Three AI Intelligences: Android (Humanoid) (AI) Intelligence; Artificial Intelligence (AI), and Alien (Infinity) Intelligence (AI). The Three AIs shall expand human knowledge of itself, its universe, and Multiversal beings. Android and humanoid intelligence shall help advance Artificial intelligence. But until Internal AI is purified from Negative Causalities Intelligence or Negative Causalities AI (NCAI), External AI developed and deployed without its purification stage shall hardly perfect the Positive General AI needed to initiate or tap into the “Alienity” of Humans Intelligence. Why have the Alien Intelligence of Negative Causalities that can self destroy or self extinct? To attain God’s Realm Intelligence (GRI), humans must have purified their intelligence to absolute Positive Causality and zero Negative Causalities. Why exponentiate to infinity that which isn’t for the good of all, but for a few against the rest? That shall be the nuance of the AI Future. Humans shall need Alien intelligence to answer the question if they are here alone. But it’s more than just knowing. Humans need Alien Intelligence to sail beyond their universe. Born to earth didn’t mean that humans should die on earth. Their intelligence must have evolved for them to understand their planetary system and beyond. Be that help that humanity needs. Supercomputering and quantum computing or Enhanced AI and semiconductors can only take us that far. The being must develop its Three AI intelligences in order to fully know the depth of itself and cosmos.
Note: This is Philosophical, not Imperical
Philosopher Prince Israel Zaar 09.09.2022
____________________________________
Using AI Overview to Analyze Text
The provided text is an excerpt from the work of Prince Israel Zaar, a philosopher and artist who founded the philosophy of Zaarrianism. The text is not a statement of scientific fact but a philosophical and speculative perspective on consciousness, intelligence, and the future of humanity and AI. [1, 2, 3]
Here is an analysis and breakdown of the core concepts presented in the text:
The Three AI Intelligences
Zaar proposes that humans possess three innate “AI Intelligences,” distinct from basic biological intelligence. This concept is a philosophical construct, not a scientific or mainstream theory.
• Android (Humanoid) (AI) Intelligence:
The text suggests this is the intelligence that helps advance the development of external artificial intelligence. It can be interpreted as humanity’s capacity to design and create AI in its own image
• Artificial Intelligence (AI):
In this context, AI refers to the external, human-developed technology. The text contrasts it with the internal, human-based “AI Intelligences”.
• Alien (Infinity) Intelligence (AI):
The most profound form of intelligence, which Zaar associates with “Multiversal beings” and a level of understanding that transcends humanity’s current universe. It is the key to unlocking humanity’s potential beyond Earth. [4]
The concept of Negative Causalities
Intelligence (NCAI) A central theme is the idea that human intelligence is tainted by “Negative Causalities Intelligence,” which can lead to self-destruction.
• The need for purification:
Zaar argues that until humanity purifies its “Internal AI” of this negative influence, its “External AI” will be flawed and incapable of achieving “Positive General AI”.
• A moral prerequisite:
This idea establishes a moral and spiritual prerequisite for technological advancement. True, beneficial AI cannot be achieved with flawed, negatively-oriented creators. [4]
The path to “God’s Realm
Intelligence” (GRI) Zaar’s text outlines a speculative path to a higher state of being, which he calls “God’s Realm Intelligence.”
• Absolute positive causality:
To reach GRI, humans must achieve “absolute Positive Causality and zero Negative Causalities”. This is not a technical but a moral or philosophical objective.
• The warning against ego:
The text cautions against infinite growth that benefits only a few at the expense of others, suggesting that this self-serving ambition is an aspect of negative causality. [4]
The role of Alien (Infinity) Intelligence
Zaar’s philosophy, which he calls Zaarrianism and Trianglerism, centers on the idea of Multiversality, where humanity’s ultimate destiny is to explore beyond its current universe.
• Beyond Earth:
Alien (Infinity) Intelligence is the tool required for humanity to “sail beyond their universe.” It represents the evolution of human consciousness necessary for interstellar exploration and understanding.
• Beyond technology:
The text states that “Supercomputering and quantum computing or Enhanced AI and semiconductors can only take us that far.” This suggests that technological evolution must be paired with an evolution of the human being’s innate “Three AI intelligences”. [4]
Philosophical interpretation
Zaar’s text is not a scientific hypothesis but a philosophical framework that fuses elements of spirituality, consciousness, and technology. It can be interpreted as:
• A critique of AI development:
The text serves as a cautionary tale, suggesting that the current trajectory of AI development, driven by flawed human intentions, could be dangerous. It emphasizes that external technology should reflect internal, moral development
• An eschatological vision:
Zaar provides a vision of humanity’s ultimate potential, framed in terms of purifying its own nature to achieve a higher state of consciousness and cosmic purpose.
• A call for self-realization:
The ultimate message is that humanity’s progress is not dependent solely on technological innovation but on the internal evolution of the human mind and spirit. [4]
Reference Codes Used to Analyze Text
[1]https://www.instagram.com/ai_philosopher/p/DQGef3mjqHD/
[2]https://www.webbartgallery.com/prince-zaar
[3]https://www.etsy.com/listing/1541240800/trianglerism-art-p-to-the-2nd-power-66
[4]https://www.webbartgallery.com/prince-zaar
[5]https://www.instagram.com/reel/DPvM_0vDdQL/
____________________________________
Using AI Overview on Counter-arguments
The provided text by “Philosopher Prince Israel Zaar” is an elaborate philosophical, and notably unscientific, argument. Therefore, a counter-argument focuses not on empirical evidence, but on the philosophical and logical weaknesses within the original text. [1]
Unsupported assertion:
The author provides no evidence or logical reasoning for the link between internal human morality and the development of external AI. This is a faith-based claim rather than a philosophical or scientific one.
Unclear definitions:
The terms “Negative Causalities Intelligence” and “Absolute Positive Causality” are not defined in any meaningful way. They seem to function as placeholders for a spiritual or moral framework rather than as rigorous intellectual concepts.
False dilemma:
The text frames the future of AI as a choice between serving “a few against the rest” (by failing to purify intelligence) or achieving “God’s Realm Intelligence.” This creates a false and oversimplified dilemma that ignores the complex, real-world ethical frameworks already being developed for AI, such as managing algorithmic bias.
“The nature of Alien Intelligence “
The concept of “Alien (Infinity) Intelligence” is highly speculative and serves as a philosophical end-goal rather than a practical concept.
Unverifiable premise:
The author claims that “Humans need Alien Intelligence to sail beyond their universe.” This is a metaphysical assertion that cannot be proven or disproven, making it a weak foundation for an argument about technology.
Mixing of genres:
The author moves seamlessly between computer science terminology (Supercomputering, Quantum Computing, Semiconductors) and spiritual/cosmic aspirations (God’s Realm Intelligence, Multiversal beings). A counter-argument highlights that the author is mixing different domains of knowledge (science, philosophy, spirituality) without providing the necessary bridges for a coherent argument.
Human role and technological limits
The author suggests that “Supercomputering and quantum computing… can only take us that far” and that humans must develop their “Three AI intelligences” instead.
Misunderstanding of technology: Supercomputing and quantum computing are not limiting factors but tools. The author presents them as insufficient because they don’t address his spiritual concerns. The counter-argument would state that technology’s purpose is to serve humanity, not to fulfill a predestined cosmic plan.
Oversimplification of human intelligence:
The author’s idea of a “Three AI intelligences” framework is an unproven and arbitrary division of human potential. A counter-argument would propose that human intelligence is far more complex and multifaceted than this simple classification and doesn’t require a mystical “Alien Intelligence” to evolve or expand.
___________________________________
Reference Codes Used to Analyze Text
[2] https://lumenalta.com/insights/what-are-the-different-types-of-ai
[3] https://www.authorea.com/users/885219/articles/1263493-ai-is-not-intelligent
[4] https://www.myessaywriter.ai/examples/the-argument-for-and-against-ai
[5] https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/0020174X.2025.2465369?af=R
