William James’s Multiverse and Prince Israel Zaar Multiversalism Philosophy

William James and Prince Israel Zaar have very different interpretations of multiverse concepts. James used the term metaphorically to describe a pluralistic and disorderly world of human experience, while Zaar uses it as a basis for his art and philosophy, which extends to ideas about artificial intelligence and future technologies. [1, 2, 3]

William James 
The American philosopher and psychologist William James coined the term “multiverse” in 1895, but his meaning is distinct from the modern scientific concept of many universes.

• Multiverse: 
James described the natural world as a “moral multiverse” to convey its fragmented, indifferent, and incoherent nature. He used the term to contrast the messy reality of human experience with the idea of a singular, perfect universe proposed by idealist philosophies.

• Multiversalism/Pluralism: 
In his 1909 book A Pluralistic Universe, James argued against the idea of a single, coherent reality (monism) and instead championed a “pluralistic” or “multiversal” view. In this view, reality is made up of many distinct but interrelated parts, much like a federal republic. This affirms the messy diversity of human experience and finite life over a single, overarching cosmic unity.

• Multiversality and Multiversal Order: 
James did not use these terms. His concept of a pluralistic “multiverse” is fundamentally about a lack of a single, all-encompassing order. He viewed the relationships between different parts of reality as external and not entirely reduced to a single unity, allowing for local orders but not a universal one.

• Multiversal Intelligence and Multiversal Realm:
These concepts are not associated with William James’s philosophical work, which focused on human experience, empiricism, and pragmatism. [1, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8]

Philosopher Prince Israel Zaar 

Prince Israel Zaar is a contemporary American artist and self-identified “Multiversal Philosopher” who has developed his own philosophy, Zaarrianism. His use of multiverse-related terms is connected to his art and theories on technology.

• Zaarrianism: 
This philosophy views humanity “through the prism of Multiversality, rather than Universality”. It argues that human intelligence should aim to journey “beyond the universe” and not be confined to it.

• Multiversalism: 
This is a core part of Zaarrianism, emphasizing the existence and exploration of realities beyond our own universe.

• Multiversality: 
For Zaar, this is the philosophical framework of Zaarrianism.

• Multiversal Intelligence (MAI): 
Zaar’s 3-D art genre, “Trianglerism,” is designed with “exponential powers of Multiversal Artificial Intelligence (MAI)” encrypted within its designs. These art pieces contain hidden codes, graphics, and symbols for developing future technologies.

• Multiversal Realm: 
This likely refers to the existence beyond our universe that Zaarrianism seeks to explore. He challenges human intelligence to journey into this realm.

• Multiversal Order: 
This concept would be part of Zaar’s philosophy of multiversal artificial intelligence and the structure of realities beyond our own, rather than a single, coherent order in our world. [2, 3, 9, 10]

Source Code

[1] https://nautil.us/the-multiverse-as-muse-236605/

[2] https://www.etsy.com/listing/1541240800/trianglerism-art-p-to-the-2nd-power-66

[3] https://www.webbartgallery.com/prince-zaar

[4] https://www.vocabulary.com/articles/wordroutes/the-geeky-cosmic-philosophical-history-of-multiverse/

[5] https://www.amazon.com/Pluralistic-Universe-William-James/dp/0803275919

[6] https://www.nebraskapress.unl.edu/nebraska-paperback/9780803275911/a-pluralistic-universe/

[7] https://philosophynow.org/issues/89/The_Multiverse_Conundrum

[8] https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=axeXyLw0CoI

[9] https://www.etsy.com/listing/1541240800/trianglerism-art-p-to-the-2nd-power-66

[10] https://www.etsy.com/listing/1541240800/trianglerism-art-p-to-the-2nd-power-66

Prince Israel Zaar

Leave a Reply