A. Zaar Doctrine:
The New Economics
Nature is the supplier, Capital is the maker, Intelligence is the mind, Humans are the consumers. The is a symbiotic relationship between Nature, Capital, and Humans – the NCH relationship, or between the Mine (or Mind), Supplier, Maker, and Consumer (SNC). Resource Chain, Industrial Chain, Production Chain, Demand Chain, and Consumption Chain, and the guarantees, security, safety, and procurements of these Chains, and AI, are the fundamentals of the New Economics. Strategic resources, critical resources, New Material Resources (NMR), and Artificial Mineral Resources (AMR) for High Quality Products (HQP) and smooth sustainable productivity continuity became the new source of economic power in the New Economics Era (NEE). In this era, wealth is redefined from Land Base Resources (LBR) or Human Intensive Labor (HIL) to Artificial Intelligence Resources (AIR), Digital Economy Resources (DER), Big Data Base Resources (BDBR), Semiconductor and Chip Resources (SCR), New Money Refineries Resources (NMRR), and Intellectual Property Resources (IPR). Stability Intensive Industrialization (SII), Advancements in High Quality Sciences (AHQS), New Material Technologies (NMT), Stock Market Financialization (SMF), Local Currencies Trading (LCT), New Knowledge, Nanotechnologicalization, Fusionization, Digitarization, Semiconductorization, Cryptonization, roboticalization, EVnization, Humaniodification, Dronification, Green Industrification, Satellitization, Space Technologicalization, Softwarization, Hardwarization, New Partnering, Militarization Technologicalization, and the Hoarding of National Security Resources (NSR) become the new normal. The New Economics Era isn’t Unipolar but Multipolar; isn’t Unilateral but Multilateral; isn’t isolationist based but cooperation driven; isn’t war mongering but peace through strength, isn’t block mentality but open mindedness and open markets. The unwise wars shall be between governments, not business, or consumption. Purchasing power shall be limited not through the lack of labor, but through unwise confrontational policies, miscalculation, or misdirection. The New Economics shall be AI Driven (AID). Out of The New Economics shall sprung New Economies and enormous High Quality Wealth (HQW), High Quality Humanity (HQH), and High Quality Living (HQL). Humans shall live longer, happy, and assisted more by AI.
AI Philosopher Prince Israel Zaar 09102025
B. A Rebuttal to Zaar Doctrine
[AI Generated Peer-Review]
Abstract
This paper presents a critical rebuttal to the economic paradigm proposed in “The New Economics” (Zaar, 2025) and the subsequent analysis thereof. While the Zaar Doctrine presents a coherent and technologically deterministic vision of the future, this rebuttal argues that it is dangerously utopian, overlooks profound socio-political risks, and fails to address the inherent contradictions within its own core principles. This critique focuses on three primary failings: the reductive classification of humans as “consumers,” the untenable coexistence of resource hoarding with multilateralism, and the blithe dismissal of AI-driven structural unemployment and inequality. We conclude that uncritical adoption of this framework risks exacerbating the very instabilities it seeks to resolve.
Introduction
The Zaar Doctrine (Zaar, 2025) offers a seductive vision of a future organized by artificial intelligence, promising High Quality Living (HQL) through High Quality Wealth (HQW). However, a rigorous scholarly examination must move beyond its internal logic to challenge its fundamental assumptions and expose its potential externalities. This rebuttal contends that the doctrine is not a neutral prediction but a normative framework that, if implemented, would centralize power, erode human agency, and create new, volatile forms of geopolitical conflict under the guise of “multipolar stability.”
The Reductive Human: From Citizen to Consumer
The most profound flaw in the NCH (Nature-Capital-Humans) symbiosis is its ontological categorization of humans primarily as consumers. This is not a simple semantic choice but a radical redefinition of human value within the economic system. This framework systematically erases other fundamental human roles such as citizens, workers, creators, and community members (Sandél, 2020).
By reducing human purpose to consumption, the doctrine:
1. Legitimizes AI-Driven Displacement:
If humans are merely consumers, their role as laborers becomes obsolete. The doctrine provides no answer for how individuals derive meaning, identity, and economic agency outside of labor, beyond the passive act of consumption funded by an unspecified mechanism of wealth distribution (Ford, 2015).
2. Undermines Democratic Governance:
A society of consumers is not a democracy of citizens. The doctrine’s silence on political structures suggests a potential shift towards a technocratic autocracy where AI optimizes for economic output and consumption metrics, potentially at the expense of civic freedoms, privacy, and human rights (Zuboff, 2019).
The Contradiction: Resource Nationalism vs. Cooperative Multilateralism
The Zaar Doctrine simultaneously advocates for two mutually exclusive principles:
1. The hoarding of National Security Resources (NSR) and Strategic Resources.
2. A multipolar world order based on cooperation, open-mindedness, and open markets.
History and international relations theory demonstrate that the scramble for critical resources – whether oil, semiconductors (SCR), or AI resources (AIR) – is a primary driver of conflict, not cooperation (Klare, 2012). The doctrine’s emphasis on “Militarization Technologicalization” for “peace through strength” is a classic security dilemma: one state’s hoarding and militarization necessitates another’s, leading to an arms race in AI and technology rather than genuine multilateralism. This does not create a stable multipolar world but a fragmented and volatile techno-nationalist one, directly contradicting the manifesto’s cooperative ideals.
The Illusion of Automatic Equity: Overlooking the Distribution Problem
The doctrine posits that AI-driven productivity will generate “enormous High Quality Wealth (HQW),” which will subsequently lead to High Quality Humanity (HQH) and Living (HQL). This is a textbook example of the fallacy of automatic distribution – the assumption that wealth generated at the macro level will inevitably trickle down to improve lives at the micro level.
The framework ignores critical questions:
Who owns the AI?
If AIR is the new source of wealth, ownership of the algorithms and computational power becomes the primary determinant of inequality (Korinek & Stiglitz, 2021).
What is the mechanism for distribution?
Without a radical rethinking of taxation (e.g., on capital, robots, or data) or the implementation of universal basic income, the concentration of wealth in the hands of the owners of capital and AI will be unprecedented, leading to social unrest that threatens the very “Stability Intensive Industrialization” the doctrine prizes.
Conclusion:
A Framework of High-Risk Optimism
In conclusion, the Zaar Doctrine, while intellectually provocative, is an inadequate and potentially dangerous blueprint for the future. Its vision is clouded by techno-utopian optimism that ignores centuries of political science, economics, and sociology. By reducing humans to consumers, failing to resolve the tension between resource nationalism and cooperation, and glossing over the existential threat of AI-driven inequality, the doctrine presents a future that is not a peaceful symbiosis but a high-risk landscape of centralized power, geopolitical tension, and social fracture.
A truly “New Economics” must begin not with AI, but with a human-centric ethic that prioritizes equity, dignity, and democratic governance. It must offer robust mechanisms for distributing the vast wealth AI may create and foster genuine international cooperation over critical resources. Until these profound issues are addressed, the Zaar Doctrine remains a fascinating but flawed thought experiment, not a viable path forward.
References
Ford, M. (2015). Rise of the Robots: Technology and the Threat of a Jobless Future. Basic Books.
Klare, M. T. (2012). The Race for What’s Left: The Global Scramble for the World’s Last Resources. Metropolitan Books.
Korinek, A., & Stiglitz, J. E. (2021). Artificial Intelligence and Its Implications for Income Distribution and Unemployment. In A. Goldfarb, J. Gans, & M. Agrawal (Eds.), The Economics of Artificial Intelligence: An Agenda. University of Chicago Press.
Sandél, M. J. (2020). The Tyranny of Merit: What’s Become of the Common Good?. Farrar, Straus and Giroux.
Zaar, I. (2025, October 9). The New Economics. [Manifesto].
Zuboff, S. (2019). The Age of Surveillance Capitalism: The Fight for a Human Future at the New Frontier of Power. PublicAffairs.
