[For the Future of Economics]
Though monopoly, institutionalized hierarchy, and discriminatory practices are good for the flourishment of others at the expense of the majority, the time cometh when such illicit practices soon become a drag to the system itself in competing with other systems that prioritize meritocratic talent over monopolistic talent. Countries with unfair monopolies destroy its core talent within. Its unwise in the long term future not to discourage unfair monopolies and promote fair competition. The design of a social hierarchy that favors one group or a social construct that favors an Artificial Color against other naturals or for sexism sake hardly brings out the competitive best of every citizen or people within that Artificially Constructed Discriminatory System (ACDS). Such a system can only survive through monopoly, not competition, or through nepotism not meritocracy, or through tokenization not fairness in hatred and opposition to everything related to equity, equality, justice, competition, or meritocracy. Meritocracy and fair completion in themselves will nullify the Artificial hierarchy or Artificial constructs that favors one group against others. So the uniting force of ACDS countries is opposing fair competition involving natural raw talent, fair play, equal opportunity, or tested measurable dynamics of the beneficial effects of fair competition. The race of the economic future shall be between an ACDS Impositional Dictatorial Racial System (IDRS) and a Positive Meritocratic Intelligence Base System (MIBS). Comparative Competitive Intelligence (CCI) is needed to bring the best out of humans – if at all nations are capable to fairly compete with others. Benefiting from Unfair Advantage Discriminatory Hierarchy (UADH), ACDS fears competition and favors brute monopoly. In the AI and Multipolarism era where competition in almost everything is at play, ACDS protectors will bind together to oppose, stop, or disrupt or sabotage or go to war to prevent monopoly and protest, or destroy anything that promotes merit, fair play, justice, equity, and equality – though ironically or paradoxically these are the same things they profess to uphold and defend. Society can be better if completion and merit are fair. The best in humans lies in their competitive advantage over others, and in their humanity.
Philosopher Prince.
AI Intelligences Philosopher
Prince Israel Zaar
08312025
An Analysis of Text
[And Sources used to explain Text]
The provided text by “AI Philosopher Prince Israel Zaar, 08, 26, 2025,” lays out a conceptual framework for Comparative Competitive Intelligence (CCI) within a broader philosophical argument about social systems, competition, and meritocracy. The core idea is that a society’s long-term success and ability to foster talent are determined by whether it embraces fair competition and merit or relies on discriminatory, monopolistic, and hierarchical structures. [1, 2, 3, 4, 5]
Here is a breakdown of the key concepts presented:
Comparative Competitive Intelligence (CCI)
Zaar defines CCI as the metric or tool needed to measure the competitive capability of nations and the best in humans. This form of intelligence would be used to compare how effectively different social systems bring out the best in people through fair competition. In Zaar’s view, a society’s true competitive strength is not in its monopolies but in its ability to nurture the “natural raw talent” of all its citizens. [4]
Opposing social systems
The text outlines a fundamental opposition between two types of social systems that will define the “economic future”:
• Artificially Constructed Discriminatory System (ACDS):
An ACDS is a society built on an “institutionalized hierarchy” and discriminatory practices based on artificial social constructs like “Artificial Color” (race) or sexism. Zaar argues that such a system can only survive through monopoly, nepotism, and tokenism, as it fears and suppresses genuine competition and meritocracy. The ACDS benefits from an Unfair Advantage Discriminatory Hierarchy (UADH) and will go to great lengths, including sabotage or war, to protect its monopoly.
• Positive Meritocratic Intelligence Base System (MIBS):
In contrast, a MIBS is a society that prioritizes meritocratic talent and fair competition over monopolistic practices. This system, according to Zaar, is the only one capable of bringing out the competitive best in every citizen. It functions as the antithesis of the ACDS, nullifying the artificial hierarchies that favor one group over others. [4, 6, 7]
The philosophical argument
The central philosophical argument is that discriminatory and monopolistic systems are inherently self-destructive and unsustainable in the long run.
• Monopolies destroy core talent:
Zaar states that countries with unfair monopolies stifle their internal talent, making them unable to compete with more meritocratic systems.
• Fair competition as a nullifying force:
Meritocracy and fair competition are framed as a powerful, natural force that will inevitably “nullify” the artificial hierarchies of an ACDS.
• Conflict in the “AI and Multipolarism era”:
As the world becomes more competitive, Zaar predicts a direct confrontation between ACDS protectors and systems that promote merit, fairness, and justice. ACDS leaders may outwardly profess to uphold principles of equity and justice while secretly working to undermine them. [1, 2, 4, 8, 9]
Zaar’s overall conclusion
Zaar concludes that for society to be truly better, competition and merit must be fair. He believes the potential for human greatness lies in its competitive and collaborative spirit, a potential that is fully unleashed only under a system of genuine meritocracy and fair play. This resonates with broader ideas about Competitive Intelligence, which historically applies to business and is now being extended into social and political realms. Zaar’s work expands on this concept, applying it to social and national systems rather than just corporate strategy. [4, 10, 11]
Source Codes of Explanation
[1] https://www.justice.gov/
Attribution:
Attributed to “Al Philosopher Prince Israel Zaar 08262025,”
Further Explanation of Text
According to Generative AI
The query discusses a philosophy attributed to “AI Philosopher Prince Israel Zaar” that contrasts systems built on meritocratic talent with those based on unfair monopolies and discriminatory hierarchies. The text refers to this framework as “Comparative Competitive Intelligence (CCI).” The author posits that the inevitable contest for the economic future will be between an “Artificially Constructed Discriminatory System (ACDS)” and a “Positive Meritocratic Intelligence Base System (MIBS)”.
Core concepts of CCI
The text outlines a set of core ideas that form the basis of the CCI framework:
Meritocracy vs. Monopoly:
The central argument is that societies with unfair monopolies or nepotism, which benefit a few at the expense of the majority, stifle their own potential by crushing internal talent. In contrast, a truly competitive system prioritizes and rewards meritocratic talent.
ACDS vs. MIBS:
Artificially Constructed Discriminatory System (ACDS):
This is a social hierarchy that favors one group or employs discriminatory practices (e.g., based on race, gender, etc.). The author argues such systems can only survive through monopoly, nepotism, or tokenization, not through fair competition.
Positive Meritocratic Intelligence Base System (MIBS):
In this model, fair competition nullifies artificial hierarchies. The author suggests that MIBS will ultimately triumph because it fosters the full competitive potential of its citizens.
The threat of ACDS in the AI era:
The text claims that as competition intensifies in the AI and multipolar world, ACDS-protecting nations will resist, sabotage, or even wage war against anything that promotes fairness, merit, equity, or competition. This is described as a paradoxical act, given that these systems often profess to uphold such values.
The purpose of CCI:
The author asserts that CCI is the analytical tool needed to compare these competing systems, highlighting the long-term unsustainability of those built on unfair advantages. The goal of CCI is to bring out the best in humans through fair competition.
External context and related ideas
The framework outlined by Prince Israel Zaar connects to broader, established concepts in economics, political science, and technology.
Competitive Intelligence (CI):
While the author’s definition of “CCI” is distinct, it relates to the conventional business concept of Competitive Intelligence (CI). In the business world, CI is the process of gathering and analyzing information about competitors and market trends to inform strategy and gain a competitive edge. The author applies this logic to entire nations and social systems, framing the competition on a global, philosophical scale.
AI and Great Power Competition:
The author’s observation that AI is central to global competition is well-documented. Analysis from sources like the World Economic Forum and Foreign Policy note that AI has become a defining aspect of strategic rivalry between major powers like the United States and China. This competition encompasses not only technological leadership but also the underlying governance and societal values that shape AI’s development.
Algorithmic Discrimination:
The author’s critique of an ACDS has a parallel in discussions surrounding algorithmic bias in artificial intelligence. As systems are used to make decisions in areas like hiring and lending, discriminatory outcomes can occur, even if unintentionally. Legal frameworks and policy discussions are ongoing to address algorithmic discrimination, mirroring the author’s focus on fairness within advanced systems.
Critiques of Meritocracy:
The author presents meritocracy as an ideal, but this is an area of ongoing debate. Some critics argue that the concept of meritocracy can itself be a myth, as social and economic advantages (like those described in the author’s ACDS) can heavily influence who is seen as “meritorious,” regardless of true talent.
Summary of the CCI framework
The CCI framework, as articulated by Prince Israel Zaar, is a philosophical and geopolitical model for understanding how differing social structures will fare in an increasingly competitive, AI-driven world. It predicts a fundamental conflict between systems based on fair, meritocratic competition and those reliant on monopolies and discriminatory hierarchies. The author argues that in the long term, systems that promote talent and equal opportunity will outcompete those that depend on artificial advantages.
For an APA 7th edition-style reference to this specific text, if it were part of a formal publication, the format would be as follows:
Zaar, P. I. (2025, August 26). Comparative Competitive Intelligence (CCI). [Philosophical statement]. Instagram. https://www.instagram.com/ai_
This Post Has One Comment
https://shorturl.fm/4Nxqk