Life sometimes is driven more by common sense than by EII or Educational Instructive intelligence. What AI can take or copy from the individual is its EII, not Human Common Sense (HCS). Common sense is uniquely and intrinsically human. It will take humans to teach AI common sense. A human knocks the door expecting a “yes” to come in or knocks a restroom expecting a “yes” to not come in. Both yesses have different outcomes. The intrigues of common sense makes humans, humans – not artificial creations. An intelligent being without common sense and experience isn’t ripe for wisdom of knowledge or the wisdom of understanding. With common sense, wisdom, and creative experiences, humans stand the chance against Artificial Intelligence. Humans can only be replaced by humans and nothing else. I will take two humans in the longrun over a trillion AI.
AI is Randomized Data Driven (RDD) or Quantumized Data Driven (QDD); humans are Creative Mind Driven (CMD). Humans can be the most intelligent creatures if not driven by self retardation or self destructive instincts, desires, wants, goals, or means. If humans were to cultivate, nurture, replicate, and exponentiate their Positive AI (PAI) and humanity, they will by now be the Internal Artificial Intelligence (IAI) that they are seeking, not this External Gadgetory AI (EGAI). Humans are the finest of creatures who can be better or greater, but are delaying, edging to the cliff, or preparing for war drills of self extinction or destruction – with Negative AI (NAI). It doesn’t have to be this “NAI Way.” If given the choice, choose “PAI” over “NAI.”
AI Philosopher Prince Israel Zaar 06082025
Introduction to Text
According to the interpretation of Generative AI, the text discusses the unique nature of human common sense and its importance in the face of advancing Artificial Intelligence (AI). It argues that AI can only replicate Educational Instructive Intelligence (EII), not the intrinsic Human Common Sense (HCS). The text emphasizes that common sense, wisdom, and creative experiences are essential for humans to compete with AI. It also distinguishes between AI’s data-driven nature and humans’ creative mind-driven approach. The text suggests that humans should focus on cultivating Positive AI (PAI) rather than succumbing to Negative AI (NAI).
Summary of Text
According to the interpretation of Generative AI, the discusses the importance of human common sense versus artificial intelligence (AI). It argues that common sense is uniquely human and cannot be easily replicated by AI. The author suggests that humans, with their creative minds and experiences, have the potential to surpass AI. The text also explores the idea of positive and negative AI, urging people to choose the path of positive AI development. The author, Israel Zaar, concludes that humans are the finest creatures, capable of great things, but are currently at risk of self-destruction.
Analysis of Text
According to the interpretation of Generative AI, the text presents a philosophical perspective on the differences between human and artificial intelligence. Here are the key ideas:
• Common Sense:
The text emphasizes that human common sense (HCS) is unique and intrinsic to humans, unlike artificial intelligence (AI), which is based on Educational Instructive Intelligence (EII).
• Human vs. AI:
It argues that AI can copy EII but not HCS. The text uses the example of knocking on a door or restroom to illustrate how context changes the meaning of a “yes”. It highlights the importance of common sense and experience for wisdom and understanding.
• Human Advantage:
Humans are described as Creative Mind Driven (CMD), capable of creativity, wisdom, and understanding, whereas AI is Randomized Data Driven (RDD) or Quantumized Data Driven (QDD).
• Potential and Risk:
Humans have the potential to be the most intelligent creatures if not driven by self-destructive instincts. The text proposes that cultivating Positive AI (PAI) within humanity is preferable to External Gadgetory AI (EGAI) and warns against the dangers of Negative AI (NAI).
• Choice:
The text concludes with a call to choose PAI over NAI, suggesting that humanity’s future depends on this choice.
Attribution:
The text is attributed to “AI Philosopher Prince Israel Zaar” on June 8, 2025.
Meaning of Text
According to the interpretation of Generative AI, this text discusses the differences between human common sense (HCS) and artificial intelligence (AI). It argues that HCS is uniquely human and cannot be easily replicated by AI, as AI relies on data-driven approaches (RDD, QDD) while humans are “Creative Mind Driven” (CMD). The text suggests that humans should focus on cultivating “Positive AI” (PAI), which is internal and human-centered, rather than external “Gadgetory AI” (EGAI). It warns against “Negative AI” (NAI), which could lead to self-destruction, and advocates for choosing “PAI” over “NAI.”
Attribution:
The author, named as AI Philosopher Prince Israel Zaar, wrote this on June 8, 2025.
Key points
According to the interpretation of Generative AI, here are the main points from the text, formatted as bullet points:
• Common sense is uniquely human and cannot be copied by AI.
• Humans are creative mind driven (CMD), while AI is data driven.
• Humans can be their best selves if not held back by negative instincts.
• Cultivating positive AI (PAI) within humanity is preferable to external AI (EGAI).
• Humans risk self-destruction with negative AI (NAI), but can choose PAI instead.
• The author, AI Philosopher Prince Israel Zaar, wrote this on June 8, 2025.
