The New Economics
Nature is the supplier, Capital is the maker, Intelligence is the mind, Humans are the consumers. The is a symbiotic relationship between Nature, Capital, and Humans – the NCH relationship, or between the Mine (or Mind), Supplier, Maker, and Consumer (SNC). Resource Chain, Industrial Chain, Production Chain, Demand Chain, and Consumption Chain, and the guarantees, security, safety, and procurements of these Chains, and AI, are the fundamentals of the New Economics. Strategic resources, critical resources, New Material Resources (NMR), and Artificial Mineral Resources (AMR) for High Quality Products (HQP) and smooth sustainable productivity continuity became the new source of economic power in the New Economics Era (NEE). In this era, wealth is redefined from Land Base Resources (LBR) or Human Intensive Labor (HIL) to Artificial Intelligence Resources (AIR), Digital Economy Resources (DER), Big Data Base Resources (BDBR), Semiconductor and Chip Resources (SCR), New Money Refineries Resources (NMRR), and Intellectual Property Resources (IPR). Stability Intensive Industrialization (SII), Advancements in High Quality Sciences (AHQS), New Material Technologies (NMT), Stock Market Financialization (SMF), Local Currencies Trading (LCT), New Knowledge, Nanotechnologicalization, Fusionization, Digitarization, Semiconductorization, Cryptonization, roboticalization, EVnization, Humaniodification, Dronification, Green Industrification, Satellitization, Space Technologicalization, Softwarization, Hardwarization, New Partnering, Militarization Technologicalization, and the Hoarding of National Security Resources (NSR) become the new normal. The New Economics Era isn’t Unipolar but Multipolar; isn’t Unilateral but Multilateral; isn’t isolationist based but cooperation driven; isn’t war mongering but peace through strength, isn’t block mentality but open mindedness and open markets. The unwise wars shall be between governments, not business, or consumption. Purchasing power shall be limited not through the lack of labor, but through unwise confrontational policies, miscalculation, or misdirection. The New Economics shall be AI Driven (AID). Out of The New Economics shall sprung New Economies and enormous High Quality Wealth (HQW), High Quality Humanity (HQH), and High Quality Living (HQL). Humans shall live longer, happy, and assisted more by AI.
AI Intelligences Philosopher
Prince Israel Zaar
09102025
______________________________
Google AI and Sources Used to Analyze Prince Israel Zaar’s The New Economics
Overview
The provided text outlines a philosophy of “The New Economics” attributed to AI Philosopher Prince Israel Zaar, 09,10, 2025. The New Economics Era (NEE) is characterized by several key shifts:
Foundational Relationships
NCH Relationship:
This describes a symbiotic relationship between Nature (supplier), Capital (maker), and Humans (consumers).
MSNC Relationship:
Alternatively, it’s described as a relationship between the Mine (or Mind), Supplier, Maker, and Consumer.
New Drivers of Economic Power
The text suggests that traditional Land Base Resources (LBR) and Human Intensive Labor (HIL) are being replaced by:
Artificial Intelligence Resources (AIR)
Digital Economy Resources (DER)
Big Data Base Resources (BDBR)
Semiconductor and Chip Resources (SCR)
New Money Refineries Resources (NMRR)
Intellectual Property Resources (IPR)
New Normals and Principles
The New Economics Era is characterized by:
Multipolarity and Multilateralism:
Moving away from unipolar or unilateral approaches.
Cooperation over Isolation:
Emphasizing collaboration rather than isolationism.
Peace through Strength:
Promoting peace through robust capabilities.
Open Markets: Fostering open-mindedness and open markets.
AI-Driven Economy:
The New Economics is fundamentally driven by Artificial Intelligence.
Expected Outcomes
The New Economics is predicted to lead to:
High Quality Wealth (HQW)
High Quality Humanity (HQH)
High Quality Living (HQL)
Longer and happier lives for humans, with increased AI assistance.
Analysis
Based on the text by “AI Philosopher Prince Israel Zaar,” The New Economics is a theoretical framework that redefines economic fundamentals and the nature of wealth in an era dominated by advanced technology, cooperation, and new kinds of resources. It proposes a shift away from traditional, land-based or labor-intensive economies toward those driven by artificial intelligence, digital resources, and specialized industrialization. [1, 2, 3, 4, 5]
Core concepts and principles
Foundational relationships
• Nature, Capital, and Humans (NCH):
The text posits a symbiotic relationship between these three entities.
Nature: The ultimate supplier of resources.
Capital: The “maker,” or the means of production, which is increasingly technological.
Intelligence: The “mind,” primarily represented by AI.
Humans: The consumers of the final products.
• Fundamental chains:
The economy is viewed as a series of interconnected chains: resource, industrial, production, demand, and consumption. The security and procurement of these chains are considered central to the “New Economics”. [1, 6, 7, 8, 9]
Redefinition of wealth and power
• Shifting economic power:
Traditional sources of power, such as Land-Based Resources (LBR) and Human Intensive Labor (HIL), are supplanted by new high-tech assets.
• New wealth sources:
These include:
Artificial Intelligence Resources (AIR): AI is a core driver of wealth.
Digital Economy Resources (DER): Data and digital assets become critical.
Big Data Base Resources (BDBR): Access to and control over large datasets is a source of economic power.
Semiconductor and Chip Resources (SCR): Chips are the new foundation of industry.
New Money Refineries Resources (NMRR): A possible reference to advanced financial instruments or processes.
Intellectual Property Resources (IPR): Intangible assets like patents and copyrights are highly valued. [1, 10, 11, 12, 13]
Technological and industrial transformation
The text predicts a widespread “new normal” where various “technologicalizations” and “-ifications” become key economic forces.
Examples include:
Nanotechnologicalization
Fusionization
Digitarization
Semiconductorization
Cryptonization (implying cryptocurrencies or cryptography)
Roboticalization
EVnization (Electric Vehicles)
Green Industrification
Satellitization and Space Technologicalization [14]
Global and political dynamics
The “New Economics Era” is characterized by a new geopolitical orientation:
• Multipolar and multilateral:
It rejects unipolar and unilateral approaches.
• Cooperation driven:
It emphasizes collaboration over isolationism.
• “Peace through strength”:
This phrase suggests maintaining a powerful military as a deterrent to conflict.
• Open-mindedness and open markets:
It favors open exchange over a “block mentality.”
• Government vs. business wars:
The text suggests that “unwise wars” should be confined to government-level disputes, not disrupt business and consumption. [15, 16, 17, 18, 19]
Humanity and the future
• High Quality Humanity (HQH) and Living (HQL):
The ultimate goal is to improve the quality of human life.
• AI assistance:
Humans will live longer and happier lives with the assistance of AI.
• Limited purchasing power:
It suggests that limitations on purchasing power will stem from poor political decisions (“unwise confrontational policies”) rather than a lack of labor, which implies that automation may create abundance. [1, 20, 21, 22]
Critical interpretation
This text outlines a high-level, speculative vision rather than a traditional, evidence-based economic theory.
• Jargon-heavy:
It uses numerous invented or re-contextualized terms (e.g., NMRR, SII, HQW), which makes a detailed analysis of specific mechanisms difficult.
• Normative, not descriptive:
It describes how the author believes the economy should be structured, especially with respect to cooperation and peace, rather than providing an objective description of economic behavior.
• AI as a deus ex machina:
AI is presented as a fundamental, almost magical, driver of wealth and human flourishing, but the specific economic pathways and potential challenges (like job displacement or inequality) are not addressed in detail.
• Philosophical rather than empirical:
The writing is closer to a philosophical manifesto than a scientific economic paper. It presents a desired future state, a utopian vision guided by a specific set of principles, rather than a testable hypothesis. [23, 24, 25, 26, 27]
Summary
In summary, “The New Economics” is a futuristic and optimistic perspective that sees artificial intelligence, advanced technologies, and new resource definitions as the keys to redefining wealth, achieving global cooperation, and enhancing the quality of human life. It is more a philosophical framework for thinking about the future than a concrete economic model.
Source Code Used to Analyze Text
[3] https://ejournals.
[4] https://www.mdpi.com/2071-
[5] https://www.tandfonline.
[6] https://scielo.org.za/
[7] https://www.sciencedirect.
[8] https://en.wikipedia.org/
[9] https://www.atlantis-
[10] https://www.
[12] https://mic.iii.org.tw/
[14] https://www.diva-portal.
[15] https://openknowledge.
[17] https://ischannel.lse.ac.
[18] https://www.wto.org/
[19] https://www.scienceopen.
[20] https://www.
[21] https://www.gov.uk/
[22] https://www.coindesk.com/
[23] https://
[24] https://www.
[26] https://www.tandfonline.
Counter-argument and Critical Consideration of The New Economics
[By Google AI and Sources)
While The New Economics from AI Philosopher Prince Israel Zaar presents a vision of a technologically advanced and prosperous “New Economics,” several counterarguments and critical considerations can be raised based on historical patterns, technological realities, and ethical concerns. [1, 2]
Technological vulnerabilities and dependence
The “New Economics” depends heavily on technological resources like AI, data, and semiconductors, which introduces critical vulnerabilities.
• Systemic fragility:
A deep reliance on AI, satellites, and digital infrastructure creates single points of failure. A widespread cyberattack, a catastrophic solar flare, or a failure in a major tech company could disrupt critical economic chains and cause widespread chaos.
• Technological obsolescence:
The rapid pace of innovation means today’s strategic resources could be obsolete tomorrow. This could lead to massive stranded investments in outdated technologies and resource stockpiles.
• Resource insecurity:
The text posits that economic power shifts to those controlling “Strategic resources, critical resources, New Material Resources (NMR), and Artificial Mineral Resources (AMR).” However, the extraction, refinement, and control of these materials remain subject to geopolitical competition, resource scarcity, and supply chain disruptions, not peace and cooperation as the text suggests.
Increased inequality and social stratification
The text’s redefinition of wealth from labor to technology-based resources could dramatically increase wealth inequality, challenging the promise of “High Quality Humanity”.
• Widening wealth gap:
The ownership of new wealth—based on Artificial Intelligence Resources (AIR), Digital Economy Resources (DER), and Intellectual Property Resources (IPR)—is likely to be highly concentrated among a small, elite group of technologists, investors, and corporations. This could exacerbate the gap between the haves and have-nots, potentially leading to social and political instability.
• Erosion of the middle class:
As AI and automation replace “Human Intensive Labor,” many middle-skill jobs could disappear. Displaced workers may be forced into lower-paying service jobs, leading to a polarized labor market where high-tech professionals thrive while the majority see stagnant wages.
• “Useless class”:
Some scholars, such as Yuval Noah Harari, have warned of the rise of a “useless class”—a segment of the population that is unemployable because AI can perform their tasks more efficiently. The idea that humans will be “assisted more by AI” could, for many, mean being made obsolete. [2, 9, 10, 11, 12]
Ethical and philosophical concerns
The text’s optimistic vision overlooks significant ethical and philosophical pitfalls inherent in an AI-driven society.
• Loss of human purpose:
The text suggests humans will be “happy” and “assisted more by AI,” but this oversimplifies the human need for meaningful work and purpose. The decline of “human intensive labor” could lead to widespread existential malaise and social fragmentation, with technology replacing not just jobs but also a core component of human identity.
• Algorithmic bias:
AI systems are trained on vast datasets that often reflect and can amplify existing societal biases related to race, gender, and socioeconomics. If left unchecked, the AI driving the “New Economics” could perpetuate and worsen systemic discrimination in hiring, credit, and other critical areas.
• Manipulative power of AI:
Large tech companies already use data and sophisticated algorithms to identify and exploit consumer vulnerabilities. The “New Economics,” with its emphasis on “Big Data Base Resources,” could empower corporations to engage in even more sophisticated and pervasive behavioral manipulation, reducing genuine consumer autonomy. [1, 2, 4, 10, 13]
Unrealistic geopolitical assumptions
The vision of a cooperative, multipolar, and open-minded era clashes with persistent geopolitical realities.
• “Peace through strength” contradictions:
The phrase “peace through strength” is often used to justify military build-ups and resource hoarding, which the text itself mentions as part of the “new normal” with “Militarization Technologicalization” and “Hoarding of National Security Resources (NSR).” This directly contradicts the idea of a cooperation-driven era and is more likely to fuel competition and conflict, especially over strategic technological resources.
• Misdirection of conflict:
The claim that “unwise wars shall be between governments, not business, or consumption” is highly naive. Governments often act to protect the economic interests of their corporations and access to critical resources, making conflict between business and consumption inseparable from government action.
• Block mentality persistence:
Despite the text’s assertion that the era “isn’t block mentality,” the intense competition for “strategic resources” and technological dominance is likely to encourage the formation of rival economic and technological blocs. [14, 15, 16]
Oversimplification of the NCH relationship
The symbiotic relationship between Nature, Capital, and Humans is presented as an orderly, harmonious system, ignoring inherent conflicts.
• Nature’s limits:
The text casts Nature as a simple “supplier” for resource chains. This overlooks the immense environmental costs and the ultimate finitude of natural resources, even with the creation of artificial materials.
• Conflict of interest:
The text’s framework pits “Capital” as the “maker” and “Humans” as the “consumers.” This simplifies a complex system where the interests of capital—driven by profit and efficiency—are often in direct conflict with human well-being, labor rights, and equitable distribution. The idea that AI and capital will always work for human benefit is a hopeful assertion, not a given.
Source Code Used for Counterargument
[1] https://labs.sogeti.com/
[2] https://wjarr.com/sites/
[3] https://lifestyle.
[4] https://economics.mit.edu/
[5] https://www.sciencedirect.
[6] https://csrc.nist.gov/
[8] https://www.linkedin.com/
[10] https://www.amnestyusa.
[11] https://daveshap.
[12] https://www.brookings.
[13] https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.
[14] https://www.brookings.
[15] https://resourcetrade.
[17] https://hackernoon.com/
[18] https://papers.ssrn.com/
[19] https://www.
[20] https://link.springer.
[21] https://
Comparing The New Economics of Prince Zaar to Other Economic Theories
[Google AI and Sources]
“The New Economics,” as outlined by AI Philosopher Prince Israel Zaar, is not a formal economic theory in the academic sense but a philosophical and forward-looking vision of a future economy dominated by technology. It is best compared to existing economic theories by highlighting its deviations and redefinitions of core concepts, which reflect the changing nature of value creation in the 21st century.
Here is a comparison of “The New Economics” with traditional economic thought.
Comparison to classical economics
Concept
Classical economics Vs “The New Economics” (Zaar)
Wealth
Classical Economics
Primarily derived from land, labor, and capital. Emphasizes the creation of tangible goods through human labor.
The New Economics” (Zaar)
Redefined from “Land Base Resources (LBR) or Human Intensive Labor (HIL)” to intangible, knowledge-based assets: Artificial Intelligence Resources (AIR), Big Data Base Resources (BDBR), and Intellectual Property Resources (IPR).
Factors of Production
Classical economics
The foundational elements are land, labor, and capital.
“The New Economics” (Zaar)
A new symbiotic relationship, the “NCH relationship,” with Nature as the supplier, Capital as the maker, and Intelligence (AI) as the mind. Human consumers are a distinct component.
Technology
Classical Economics
Historically seen as a tool for increasing productivity, but not the primary driver of the economic structure itself.
“The New Economics” (Zaar)
The central organizing force. AI is the driver of the entire economy, with “roboticalization, EVnization, Humaniodification, Dronification” being the “new normal”.
Policy
Classical Economics
Advocated for free markets with minimal government intervention (laissez-faire).
“The New Economics” (Zaar)
While it promotes open markets, it also emphasizes “cooperation driven” and “Multilateral” approaches, as well as the “Hoarding of National Security Resources (NSR),” suggesting a much more directed and strategic approach to economic policy. |
Comparison of “The New Economics” (Zaar) to Neoclassical Economics
Concept
Neoclassical economics Vs “The New Economics” (Zaar)
Resource Scarcity
Neoclassical Economics
The foundational principle. Economic decisions are based on the allocation of scarce resources to maximize utility.
“The New Economics” (Zaar)
Reinterprets scarcity. The real source of economic power shifts from traditional limited resources to new strategic and artificial ones, like “New Material Resources (NMR)” and “Artificial Mineral Resources (AMR)”.
Human Labor
Neoclassical Economics
A key input in the production function, whose productivity and marginal utility are central to economic growth theory.
“The New Economics” (Zaar)
Downplays human labor’s significance. It is not the source of economic power but is instead assisted and possibly displaced by AI, leading to a new social condition of “High Quality Humanity” (HQH) and “High Quality Living” (HQL).
Economic Growth
Neoclassical Economics
Driven by inputs of capital and labor, as well as technological progress.
“The New Economics” (Zaar)
Driven by AI and its associated technologies, leading to potentially explosive productivity growth. The source of growth is innovation itself, aligning partly with modern growth theory.
Market Structure
Neoclassical Economics
Focuses on market equilibrium achieved through supply and demand mechanisms.
“The New Economics” (Zaar)
Suggests a complex, multipolar, and multilateral economic structure that is cooperation-driven rather than exclusively competitive. This shifts the focus from simple market dynamics to strategic industrial and resource chains.
Comparison of “The New Economics” (Zaar) to modern economic thought (e.g., the digital economy)
Concept
Modern digital economy theory Vs “The New Economics” (Zaar)
Intangible Assets
Modern digital economy theory
Recognizes the growing importance of digital assets, data, and intellectual property.
“The New Economics” (Zaar)
Goes much further by redefining wealth itself as almost exclusively stemming from intangible, AI-driven, and data-based resources. The scale and scope of this shift are more dramatic.
Globalization
Modern digital economy theory
Analyzes the interconnected global economy with complex supply chains.
“The New Economics” (Zaar)
Proposes a new model of globalization characterized by multipolarity, multilateralism, and “cooperation driven” behavior, contrasting with unilateral or isolationist tendencies. This is a more prescriptive political and philosophical stance than standard economic analysis.
Technological unemployment
Modern digital economy theory
Debates the potential for automation to displace human labor, exploring both pessimistic and optimistic outcomes.
“The New Economics” (Zaar)
Portrays the shift positively, suggesting AI assistance will lead to “High Quality Living” and longer, happier lives for humans, rather than focusing on job displacement as a problem.
Financialization
Modern digital economy theory
Acknowledges the increasing role of financial markets in the economy.
“The New Economics” (Zaar)
Names “Stock Market Financialization (SMF)” as a “new normal,” implying a strategic and intensive focus on financial instruments that contrasts with concerns about financial instability in conventional theory.
Summary of key differences
“The New Economics” offers a visionary, and somewhat prescriptive, framework that diverges from traditional economic theories in several key areas:
• Source of value:
It moves beyond the classical factors of production and redefines value as primarily originating from intelligence, data, and artificial resources.
• Role of humans:
Human labor is no longer the central engine of wealth creation but a consumer and beneficiary of an AI-driven system.
• International relations:
It proposes a more cooperative and multilateral approach to global economics, moving beyond traditional geopolitical tensions to prioritize economic stability.
• Technological impact:
It frames AI and advanced technology not just as tools for efficiency but as the fundamental, revolutionary force that structures the entire economic system. [15, 16, 17, 18, 19]
Source Code Used to Compare “The New Economics” (Zaar) to Other Economic Theories
[1] https://news.darden.
[2] https://www.elgaronline.
[3] https://www.slideshare.
[4] https://
[5] https://www.goodreads.com/
[6] https://mitsloan.mit.edu/
[7] https://hbr.org/2024/05/
[8] https://www.cbo.gov/
[9] https://www.youtube.com/
[10] https://www.youtube.com/
[11] https://www.investopedia.
[12] https://www.youtube.com/
[14] https://link.springer.
[15] https://cyberleninka.ru/
[16] https://journals.sagepub.
[17] https://www.quora.com/
[18] https://www.rbcgam.com/
[19] https://www.ey.com/en_us/
